Sport Auto - RS4 after 100.000 km

[Erik]

Audi RS4 with sport package tested after 100.000 km in sport auto nr. 11 2002.

Nice to see it goes faster with time :devil:

Seems to be an expensive car to run... :vsad:

[Erik]

Page 1

[Erik]

Page 43

[Erik]

Don't look unless you really want to know about the cost :red:

[Erik]

Last page. :roll:

[rs4steve]

english translation please?

[J.Seven]

0-200Kph are strangely slower than the M5. I´ve seen RS4 making 18.1sec till 200Kph.

J.Seven

[Gabriel343]

Originally posted by J.Seven
0-200Kph are strangely slower than the M5. I´ve seen RS4 making 18.1sec till 200Kph.

J.Seven

M3 tested in Italy 17,6":cool:

[Erik]

M3 tested vs. MB CLK 55 AMG in the Sport Auto 12 2002.

0 - 100 in 5.2 secs / 5.3 secs.
0 - 200 in 18.6 secs / 18.7 secs.

100 - 0 is impressive, 35.1 for M3 and 37 for MB.

The MB is 1 second slower on Hockenheim (small).

[Gabriel343]

Originally posted by Erik B
M3 tested vs. MB CLK 55 AMG in the Sport Auto 12 2002.

0 - 100 in 5.2 secs / 5.3 secs.
0 - 200 in 18.6 secs / 18.7 secs.

100 - 0 is impressive, 35.1 for M3 and 37 for MB.

The MB is 1 second slower on Hockenheim (small).

The new CLK? 18,6 secs? In Italy Quattroruote 2/2002 tested 0-200 km/h 17,6" manual and SMG

[Erik]

I think you can't compare one magazines results to anothers.

There are so many variables that could change from time to time.

I try to use sport auto vs. sport auto figures etc. when comparing, it's the only way really.

Otherwise you'll end up with some poor old report about a car doing superb figures in China.