Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: RS4 Summary of fact/ rumour concerning likely spec

  1. #1
    Registered User ndrummond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    15

    RS4 Summary of fact/ rumour concerning likely spec

    This subject has been discussed on a variety of other performance car forums. In case you don't have the time to trawl through them all, I thought it might be helpful to include a synthesis of what other people are saying we should expect of the next RS4:

    1. 4.2.naturally aspirated V-8 Fuel Stratified Injection (FSI) engine good for about 400bhp.

    2. New engine expected to be smaller/ more compact than current V-8 and mated to a new shorter length gearbox will allow engine to fit further back in chassis improving overall weight distribution - but it still won't be 50:50.

    3. Torsen differential altered so that power now split 40:60 between front: rear, versus current 50:50. (I expect this will improve handling and turn in, but I'd be grateful if the real petrolheads out there could explain the benefits of this to amateur enthusiasts like me.)

    4. Given overall quality of B6 chassis, the handling should be better than the current RS6, even though it will have less power.

    5. Expected to be shown at March 2005 Geneva Autoshow and made available soon after.

    There a some other unconfirmed factors that are interesting if not yet certain:

    6. Audi is developing a DSG gearbox for its higher performance cars which may be avaiable on the RS4.

    7. Everyone agrees that the RS4 needs to shed some weight. Weight savings could come from including aluminium bonnet, boot and miscellaneous other body panels. The suspension could also utilise aluminium. This is likely to be costly without a significant gain. What it really needs is an aluminium platform, but this won't happen because of the time/ cost to engineer one.

    8. Expect beefed up brakes that force induct air to ensure efficient cooling, hence large inlet ducts on protype seen lapping the Ring.

    One thing everyone agrees on is that this car cannot come soon enough. Some people think it is coming too late in the model cycle.

    Given recent developments across the high-performance category, this car should be a mighty beast. Whereas the current S4 may not comprehensively eclipse the M3 - a debate that is sure to continue - I think we can all be sure that the RS4 will definitely eat it for breakfast.

    Many people who saw the new A6 at Geneva are surpised at how god the new grille looks in the flesh. The overall lines show that Audi's design language is progressive without being too contraversial. The new grille with more agressive additions to the current A4 body shape should result in a car that looks sensational.

    My own personal hope is that the RS4 will have a DSG gearbox and better fuel consumption. (FSI technology does deliver greater economy as well as meeting Euro 4 emission requirements.)

    I welcome any additions or corrections to this data - it is just an edited version of what others are saying - not fact from an industry source - so please, anyone close to Quattro Gmbh, give us the scoop - and Audi, if you're listening please release the RS4 as soon as you can. As soon as the final specification is officially announced, my order is going in. ('Bye 'bye M3)!

  2. #2
    Moderator Benman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Temecula, CA USA
    Posts
    8,328
    The naturally aspirated V8 sounds realistic (although I think quite a few of us will be sad to see the first RS model that does not have a turbo configuration ). The new 40/60 torque split sounds promising. As you state the weight savings seems unlikely due to costs so it will be interesting to see if the car weights any less than the S4. But we do want it to come soon!
    Ben

  3. #3
    Registered User grizzly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Germany, Munich
    Posts
    26
    In the new German Auto Bild, there is some info about a N/A 4,2l FSI with 420PS. for the RS4 coming early 2005.
    ciao grizzly

    *Quattro bedeutet dass man erst dort stecken bleibt, wo der Abschleppwagen nicht mehr hinkommt*
    I will translate it sometimes.

  4. #4
    Registered User remedy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    84
    One thing everyone agrees on is that this car cannot come soon enough. Some people think it is coming too late in the model cycle.
    Audi always makes the RS-editions late in the model cycle. Probably to boost the line's image before a new model is launched.

  5. #5
    Registered User ndrummond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    15
    Originally posted by Benman
    [B. As you state the weight savings seems unlikely due to costs so it will be interesting to see if the car weights any less than the S4. Ben [/B]
    What do you think: A lighter engine and transmission; aluminium for suspension components; aluminium for bonnet, front wings and bootlid/ tailgate; plus lighter seats could save about 100 -150 kgs in total? This reduction might not make much difference overall, but would certainly help if the weight were reduced from front end?

  6. #6
    Moderator Benman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Temecula, CA USA
    Posts
    8,328
    Originally posted by ndrummond
    What do you think: A lighter engine and transmission; aluminium for suspension components; aluminium for bonnet, front wings and bootlid/ tailgate; plus lighter seats could save about 100 -150 kgs in total? This reduction might not make much difference overall, but would certainly help if the weight were reduced from front end?
    I doubt much weight will be saved through the engine and transmission. The suspension already has some aluminium in it's construction (although they could certainly use more). The front fenders and hood could shave some wieght but again, not much. I predict that the RS 4 will NOT weight 100 LBS ( let alone KGS) less than the S4. Feel free to quote me. And I will be HAPPY to eat crow if I'm wrong. Because it will mean a better driver's car for all of us!
    Ben

  7. #7
    Registered User tailpipe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    LONDON
    Posts
    1,245

    Confirmation of RS4 rumours

    According to the story in Autobild, quoted elsewhere on this website, ndrummond's summary of likely RS4 spec appears to be verified. It will have the new 4.2 litre V8 FSI engine. However, an automatic option for the gearbox will not be offered. I find this disappointing because the many positive reports about both DSG and the new 6-speed autobox fitted on the S4, make such an option highly desirable. By the way, it is worth checking out the facelifted A4 range - it looks sensational. I can't wait to see it in the flesh. I think it is likely to be very successful.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    793
    if you have DSG, you don't need automatic. There is also the possibility of a sequential type gearbox, possibly from Australia (no do your own research).
    With Audi's present quattro arrangement, he problem with a shorter gearbox is that it doesn't matter what you do, you still have the engine ahead of the front axle. Until Audi solves this problem, there will always be handling compromises, so there are limits as to what anybody is capable of achieving. One way of getting round this problem, for a race car, is to set the engine behind the front axle and then fix a device rather like a chain saw to the front wheel take-offs to another set of takeoffs monted in front of the engine.

    R+C

  9. #9
    Registered User TheBrit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    347
    Originally posted by Nordschleife
    With Audi's present quattro arrangement...
    Do you think use of the Torsen T3 (type C) diff could improve packaging options? As an aside, the T3 also allows nominal torque splits other than 50/50, so it could be an option if the rumours of rear-weighted splits are true.
    +=====================================+
    ChrisB aka TheBrit, as named by Clout & SantorinSteve over on AW.

    Now
    +-------
    Daytona Grey C6 RS 6 Avant
    Meteor Grey S5 Tip

    History
    +-------
    Lava Grey C6 allroad 3.0 TDI
    Daytona Grey D3 S8 (twice)
    Ebony Black D3 W12 SWB
    Ebony Black C5 allroad 2.5 TDI Tip Limited Edition
    Silver A2 1.6 FSI SE
    Silver C5 A6 Avant 2.7T Sport
    Volcano Black B5 A4 2.8 qm Sport

  10. #10
    Moderator Benman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Temecula, CA USA
    Posts
    8,328
    Originally posted by TheBrit
    Do you think use of the Torsen T3 (type C) diff could improve packaging options? As an aside, the T3 also allows nominal torque splits other than 50/50, so it could be an option if the rumours of rear-weighted splits are true.
    That's interesting. That could be what they're looking for to better the rear wheel feel.
    Ben

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •