I can't stand all the 180 degree opinions in different magazines. It just supports the premise that all magazine reviews are financially motivated drivel. Interestingly only the British journals seem to have some semblance of honesty. At any rate this most recent comparison article made no sense to me. They were critical of the handling, chasis, and brakes on the RS-6, claiming the E55 was much better in twisties. Either they never actually drove the vehicles or need driving lessons. I didn't see a E55 in the top 10 cars in the world speed GT challenge. I'm sort of sensitive about this stuff and wish there was some truthfullness in automotive journalism. It's one thing to have subjective evaluations and opinions but this feature was as close to an actionable lie as I've seen in a long time. Did anyone read this review?![]()