Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 18 of 44

Thread: r8 v10 high speed test in nardo

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236

    r8 v10 high speed test in nardo

    Today in auto motor sport

    r8v10 100 200 300
    4,3 13,4 46,4
    Aston martin v12 vantage
    4,7 15,6 68,5
    911 gt3 mk2
    4,4 13,8 52,6
    Cadi cts-v
    5,0 15,2 94
    lambo murci
    3,7 11,8 29,9
    slr
    3,9 10,7 30,8


    old nardo hihg speed test

    z06 up to 300 kmh 44 sec
    alpina b6s 300kmh 42 sec
    m6 300kmh 42 sec
    911 turbo 300kmh 41 sec
    gt2 300kmh 36 sec

    rs6 730 hp in 36 sec

    what would the r8v10 put down wiht 560-600 hp....

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,151
    nothing it will be if even M6 is faster
    R8 V10 is too slow rgrd its competitors

    Next M6 will beat it for sure with great margin
    facelifted 911 turbo is much-much faster as well

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    1,448
    Quote Originally Posted by audi_ch View Post
    Today in auto motor sport

    r8v10 100 200 300
    4,3 13,4 46,4
    Aston martin v12 vantage
    4,7 15,6 68,5
    911 gt3 mk2
    4,4 13,8 52,6
    Cadi cts-v
    5,0 15,2 94
    lambo murci
    3,7 11,8 29,9
    slr
    3,9 10,7 30,8


    old nardo hihg speed test

    z06 up to 300 kmh 44 sec
    alpina b6s 300kmh 42 sec
    m6 300kmh 42 sec
    911 turbo 300kmh 41 sec
    gt2 300kmh 36 sec

    rs6 730 hp in 36 sec

    what would the r8v10 put down wiht 560-600 hp....
    Clarification here is apparently needed...

    997 Turbo results and all other are done two years ago when AMS measured all cars at VW test track in Germany-that track is VERY LONG STRAIGHT!
    It is normal that cars are always little bit slower on Nardo...

  4. #4
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043
    One of the slowest tests for a long time...
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    nope, this high speed test happends every year in nardo, and indeed a few other cars wear faster, aswell 911 turbo in nardo.

    See also this test here, nothing mutch about more stright.

    http://www.rs6.com/forum/showthread....ght=koenigsegg

    we have to accept as what it is, r8v10 is a great care and a great engine, i just looks like other cars in the same price level, are faster what stright lines acceleration means..

    Indeed we have to wait for new 911 turbo (maybee aswell new m6) and then we have an even comparing.

    Turbo is on his way, will look forward to see what he can do in the supertest..

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    High speed test nardo 2008

    http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/f...65.html?item=6

    results at the bottom

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    1,448
    Quote Originally Posted by audi_ch View Post
    nope, this high speed test happends every year in nardo, and indeed a few other cars wear faster, aswell 911 turbo in nardo.

    See also this test here, nothing mutch about more stright.

    http://www.rs6.com/forum/showthread....ght=koenigsegg

    we have to accept as what it is, r8v10 is a great care and a great engine, i just looks like other cars in the same price level, are faster what stright lines acceleration means..

    Indeed we have to wait for new 911 turbo (maybee aswell new m6) and then we have an even comparing.

    Turbo is on his way, will look forward to see what he can do in the supertest..
    Sorry but, you are totally wrong. 2007 AMS tested at VW test track http://www.racingflix.com/getvideo.asp?v=1705

    I have that issue of AMS also.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by KresoF1 View Post
    Sorry but, you are totally wrong. 2007 AMS tested at VW test track http://www.racingflix.com/getvideo.asp?v=1705

    I have that issue of AMS also.
    dont think i am wrong, i said nardo happens every year, and yes it does, never said every year with ams...

    And yes 911 turbo performed on nardo aswell...

    So dont get your point.

    Btw 911 gt2 nardo time 34 secs up to 300kmh, contidrom time 36 sec up to 300kmh, (see link above with koenigsegg so you see 2 completly different places, simular results...

  9. #9
    Moderator RXBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,838
    V10 is fast. very fast.

    but torque is king. audi needs to put a turbocharged engine and a DSG to get the most out of it in a car like the R8. the V10 will keep it competitive another 3-4 years. maybe audi should just unleash the whole 556 hp and be done with it. seems like the world throws in an R8 in every comparo while the LP560 just kind of shows up once in a while. just goes to show you which car is more alive/relevant in the world's consciousness.

    PS- the CTS-V is faster in every way than the M6, so there is no way the difference is that much- conclusion-----the two tests are completely different and numbers can't be compared.
    Past- A4, TT, S4

    Present- R8 V10

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    25
    Sorry, am I missing something here ???

    0-100 km in 4.3 seconds ???

    Much slower than Audi's own specs !!!!

    I personally achieved 0-100 in 4.4 secs in my standard manual R8V8 as measured and published in "Performance VW magazine" using a Racelogic "Driftbox" GPS unit.

    I have had my V10 for 3 months and acceleration is MUCH faster than V8.

    The acceleration figures indicated are very slow for all cars.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by R8 England View Post
    Sorry, am I missing something here ???

    0-100 km in 4.3 seconds ???

    Much slower than Audi's own specs !!!!

    I personally achieved 0-100 in 4.4 secs in my standard manual R8V8 as measured and published in "Performance VW magazine" using a Racelogic "Driftbox" GPS unit.

    I have had my V10 for 3 months and acceleration is MUCH faster than V8.

    The acceleration figures indicated are very slow for all cars.
    wouldnt call it slow 30 sec or less for 300 kmh.

    By the way on 28 degres celsius the r8v10 didnt reach his 316 kmh top speed, then an other go with 25 degres and he put down his 316 kmh top speed. Maybee he sufferd under the outside temperature.

    Rarely acceleration test are made up to 300 kmh or higher, Ctvs problem is his gearing, witch defenitly make him very slow up to 300 kmh. M6 has 7 speed gearing and his extra gear helps him alot for this kind of thing.

    This is by the way the reason why he can keep up with the stronger but 6 speed alpine b6s...

    In the other hand the 911 gt2 is almost as fast as the murcielago up to 250-260 but loses afterwards almost 5-6 secs up to 300 kmh on him, so that must also be a kind of the gear box ratio i guess, as otherwise the gap should happend earlier around 200 kmh already..

    New porsche 911 turbo will have 7 gear pdk. But his 7th gear is just an overdirve gear (instead of the m6 7th gear) means topspeed is reached in 6th gear, so i guess the new turbo will be quicker but not as mutch up to 300 kmh as we think now

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    ah what i didnt mentiond was that the gtr was also at the test, but after in high speed run his engine was dead.......

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,151
    and the gtr results were...?

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by artur777 View Post
    and the gtr results were...?
    not puplished, but expect up to 300 kmh somewhere 52-54 secs

    GTr los alot after 200 kmh to his competitors

  15. #15
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043
    0-300 km/h in around 30 seconds is respectable.
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Italia
    Posts
    810
    from another forum

    the AMS article states that the NISSAN GTR could not succesfully participate in the test as its engine blew after one fast lap. No kidding.

  17. #17
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043
    Quote Originally Posted by andreadebi View Post
    from another forum

    the AMS article states that the NISSAN GTR could not succesfully participate in the test as its engine blew after one fast lap. No kidding.


    Oh I think we just got a need for a scan and a quick translation.
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    there is just one sentence with the gtr.

    After one high speed lap with 314kmh he had to brake down because of the engine malfunction

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •