Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 181 to 192 of 192

Thread: Just talked to someone, and got the scoop on the RS5 motor...

  1. #181
    Moderator RXBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,838
    the most important issue for audi this RS5 gen has been the problem of the R8. why? it is the basis for a fundamental marketing and expense issue- the issue of niche and model line separation. were audi to develop a charged engine to go into the RS5 it would obviously be a creation at highest level of engineering because, as George says, it has to be to go into an RS model. as such, it would be at least be a superior engine to the current RS4 engine. audi cannot put such an engine into the RS5 without it ALSO going into the base R8 too. we all know the R8 can't take a charged angine of any kind. further, audi would have to build TWO engines when they could get by with one. in the next gen R8 the issue will be moot because it will be designed to accomodate a charged engine (project AVUS). so, by conclusion, the RS5 engine WILL be N/A for sure.

    i also am sure that the 4.0T V8 will debut in the new A8 this september- to replace the aging FSI V8 that has been outclassed by the 3.0T in the A6. this will be but the FIRST version of this engine that we will see, with a higher tuned version probably appearing as an S6/S7/S8 engine.

    i also see audi moving the S version of its models to a more accessible demographic so they can in essence take on the upper level non-M offerings of bmw and merc. i wouldn't be surprised- in fact- to see bmw rename its updated 335i (333 hp for 2010 MY) as 335i M-drive or M-line or Sport to separate it from the 328i. it is for this reason that i do not see there being a gas engine above the 2.0T and below the S4's in the A4 model line. audi can upgrade the 2.0T's output to 225-240 anytime it wants and still get good emissions and mpgs, thereby bridging the gap between the two.

    car companies HAVE to get leaner and meaner to survive. and this is how it will start. i personally have no problem with it. we'll see if i am right.
    Past- A4, TT, S4

    Present- R8 V10

  2. #182
    Registered User tailpipe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    LONDON
    Posts
    1,245
    RXBG,

    Please explain why R8 wouldn't be able to take 4.0L charged engine.

  3. #183
    Registered User G@Fourtitude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by tailpipe View Post
    George,

    I don't agree with you about RS models being able to do whatever they like because they only sell in very small volumes. When former London Mayor, Ken Livingstone, announced a new potential congestion tax of £25 per day for cars emitting more than 225 g/km of CO2, sales of Porsches in the Capital dropped off a cliff. With excessively high oil prices for most of 2007 year and the onset of the recession last year, suddenly we're all being very careful about what we drive. It isn't just about cutting back financially either. No one wants to be SEEN driving a high performance car in times like these. If such issues affect Porsche in a price bracket above that of Audi, you can bet your last buck that both firms are thinking about how to combine performance with economy.

    This is exactly what Porsche has done with the latest incarnations of the Boxter and Cayman. So i fully expect future Audi RS models to do the same and have very clever tech in them. If the RS5 has simply a better breathing version of the existing 4.2 block mated to a manual box, then it is likely to have a very short shelf life indeed.
    London (for now) is a unique market. I was in Washington, DC yesterday and I saw plenty of big motor cars. There will be a market for big engines... granted, it likely won't be nearly the market that we saw even a year ago and it's why companies like Bentley are seeing sales slide hard.

    At Porsche, the Boxster/Cayman represent the mass sales. RS cars are more like the GT3/GT2 in porsche model range speak. Volume as compared to rest of Audi lineup is very low and prices are quite a bit premium.

    The other important thing is that the new 4.0L is SIGNIFICANTLY smaller and lighter than the existing 4.2L engine, which means it can be positioned further back in the MLP chassis for all models and, with a lower mass, overall weight distribution is improved.
    This is a fairly safe assumption, but I've not talked to anyone who's yet confirmed the size of the motor. What's your source on this?

    As you note, Michael Dick has said that Audi will go for a lighter engine with a smaller displacement. This is exactly what the 4.0L is. No wonder that Porsche wants to use this engine in both the Panamera and 928 replacement.
    He said that in the context of S-cars. I don't doubt that the 4.2 will give way to the 4.0 in a new modular engine family, but I don't know that high-rev vs forced induction is a dead issue. Hatz likes the high-rev concept and they have the wide range of models for which to develop variations on the 4.0 theme. I'd like to see forced induction for the tunability, but that doesn't necessarily mean it will happen.

    I think Audi has to have a V8. With the brilliant new M3, equally good C63 and not bad IS-F, the segment demands it.
    My best guess is that this is still a very safe assumption.

    Back to the RS5. Is Audi just playing a numbers game and rushing out a car to compete with BMW and Mercedes? I hope not.
    I don't follow the reason for this question. The car hasn't been rushed and the engine has been in the plans for some time. I've had confirmation on it for over a year. It's not a reactionary or rushed project.
    - George Achorn
    Editor-in-Chief, Fourtitude.com - The Audi Enthusiast Website

  4. #184
    Registered User G@Fourtitude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    30
    BTW, Hatz told me that, in the case of RS, superchargers don't have the power delivery you need for RS performance, so he'd opt for turbos if not high-rev.
    - George Achorn
    Editor-in-Chief, Fourtitude.com - The Audi Enthusiast Website

  5. #185
    Moderator RXBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,838
    Quote Originally Posted by tailpipe View Post
    RXBG,

    Please explain why R8 wouldn't be able to take 4.0L charged engine.
    can't cool it. even a S/C motor needs a bit more cooling. and, although by some stretch feasible, SC the way i understand it currently can't produce the flexibility an R8 type car needs- only mid engine S/C car in recent memory that has had some success was the GT40.
    Past- A4, TT, S4

    Present- R8 V10

  6. #186
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by G@Fourtitude View Post
    BTW, Hatz told me that, in the case of RS, superchargers don't have the power delivery you need for RS performance, so he'd opt for turbos if not high-rev.
    That strikes me as an odd thing to say. If he's looking at V6 for new RS then it makes sense I guess, but the latest Eaton TVS in the new A6/S4 and Jag's XF and XK run ~100-110hp per litre. Put this in a 4.x V8 and surely you've enough power and torque and much better throttle response than turbos (Jag's in gear acceleration is better than the current RS6)

    Marv

  7. #187
    Registered User Leadfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    7,791
    Quote Originally Posted by Marv View Post
    That strikes me as an odd thing to say. If he's looking at V6 for new RS then it makes sense I guess, but the latest Eaton TVS in the new A6/S4 and Jag's XF and XK run ~100-110hp per litre. Put this in a 4.x V8 and surely you've enough power and torque and much better throttle response than turbos (Jag's in gear acceleration is better than the current RS6)

    Marv
    I happen to agree with you Marv, I can't imagine why Audi feel that the Eaton TVS supercharger wouldn't suit RS applications and turbos would. Maybe it's an efficiency thing and the turbos offer more power vs economy and emissions but they are more problematic when it comes to packaging and lag.

    I know very little on the subject of engine design so have to conceed to their better knowledge and judgement. But on reflection of the car which have or are currently using superchargers I can only say that on each occasion these examples have been very impressive and at the top of their games, always able to stand toe to toe with the competition and in most cases head and shoulders better than the competition as is the case with the XFR and S4.
    Search and you will find the truth.

  8. #188
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043
    I've driven the MTM R8 Kompressor, and I agree. It was very powerful, but also un-RS (talking RS4 here) in the way that you go from a high revving concept to a more torquey one.
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  9. #189
    Registered User Leadfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    7,791
    Quote Originally Posted by Erik View Post
    I've driven the MTM R8 Kompressor, and I agree. It was very powerful, but also un-RS (talking RS4 here) in the way that you go from a high revving concept to a more torquey one.
    You're right Erik but then the same is true if they had chose to use turbos instead of a supercharger. It too would have been a more torquey one instead of a high revving concept, that's my point both serve the same purpose and behave quite similarly in that revs drop and torque goes up.

    When would Audi prefer to use turbos instead of supercharging for RS, on a purely performance stand point I just don't get it. :eye:
    Search and you will find the truth.

  10. #190
    Registered User QuattroFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    430
    A 4.2L HDZ NA engine with at least 450PS is the only way to go with the upcoming RS5 - save the FI and cubic downsizing for future generations when I will drive something else

  11. #191
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    13
    I'm not sure if this was mentioned before but I read a article that speculated that there will be a rs4 and that it will only be sold as an avant, and the rs5 will get a modified 4.2l v8 making 450 hp.

    here's the article.

    Audi’s family of RS models continues to expand into segments as of yet untouched by Ingolstadt’s internal skunkworks quattro GmbH, though the core of the line has always remained centered on Audi’s B-segment offerings. With the changeover of that particular platform to the MLP-based B8 and the addition of the sculpted A5/S5 coupes, the upcoming RS 4 and even RS 5 are perhaps some of the most hotly anticipated RS cars ever. To that end, there’s been more speculation on the details of the RS 4 and RS 5 than ever before – from engine offerings to other expected hardware. Below is a summary of what we’ve been able to piece together from our sources along with links to the most prominent sources of additional information in the press.


    QUICK BACKGROUND: AUDI RS 5
    It is fully expected that the Audi RS 5 will debut ahead of the RS 4. If Audi test mules are an indicator (and they usually are), that’ll be precisely the case. A black RS 5 mule wearing a production nose has been photographed on numerous occasions in California, while an even closer-to-production version with cladding that masked the production car’s wider flared arches was recently nabbed testing at the Nurburgring. Both appearances stirred up all sorts of speculation within the press.

    Based on what we’ve seen and what we’ve been able to confirm with sources at Audi, we think we’ve dialed in closely on the look of the RS 5. These renderings use the same design elements lifted from images of the test mules to dictate the nose whereas earlier Fourtitude CGIs and the highly convincing RS 5 vs. M3 photoshops printed by CAR Magazine utilized the now-aging nose of the RS 6. So the snout will look considerably closer to that of the TT RS, but Audi Design tells us the RS 5 will most definitely make use of the Ur quattro-inspired blister fenders seen on the RS 6 – a perfect match to the S5’s coupe stature.

    The rest of the look in our CGI is textbook RS equipment at this point. The honeycomb bar-less grille, RS-style split 5-spoke wheels, satin aluminum mirror housings and the optional Titanium pack are all integrated into our RS 5 rendering. Audi tends to be very consistent in their S and RS design language application, so it is our guess that these should be quite close to production.

    Could there be an RS 5 Cabriolet? Audi went this way in the B7 generation RS 4 so there’s no reason to think it couldn’t happen. That said, the RS 4 Cabriolet had a hard time selling out its extremely limited inventory in the USA, so a drop top RS 5 stateside may be a harder sell even though the US is traditionally Audi’s best market for convertibles.


    QUICK BACKGROUND: AUDI RS 4:
    There’s been much less mention of the RS 4, but quattro GmbH boss Stefan Reil confirmed its existence to us during a roundtable interview in Neckarsulm last year and we expect it to come to market shortly behind the RS 5.

    With a V8 S5 selling alongside a 3.0T S4 in the USA in 2010, the idea of a normally-aspirated high-rev V8 RS 5 and a twin turbo V6 RS 4 seemed intriguing to us. We posed the question to Audi AG engine czar Wolfgang Hatz and he said that the business case isn’t there for multiple B-level RS engines… even prior to the economic meltdown. Even though a twin turbo V6 project began during the development of the B7 RS 4 and it was again examined during the gestation of the S4, the RS 4 must share its engine and drivetrain in order to make a business case.

    More interesting on the RS 4 is that it returns to the example set by the B4 RS 2 and B5 RS 4 to be sold as an Avant only. Sources tell Fourtitude that the RS 4 sedan was done to meet U.S. demand. Without North American planned inventory, an RS 4 sedan fails to make a case for itself.

    Why no RS 4 sedan for America? The theory is that there’s only enough market for one RS model within the B segment in the USA and that model is the more premium and more mainstream sexy coupe. Audi remains coy as to whether even the RS 5 will make the final cut but this seems more message positioning than anything. Our intel suggests the RS 5 is all but a foregone conclusion for the States.

    Details on the RS 4 Avant are less clear than the RS 5 because no mules have been sighted as of yet. That said, Audi’s RS design consistency makes the Avant easy to envision. The accompanying RS 4 Avant CGI includes many of the same elements we’ve applied to the coupe – the frowning RS style air intakes at the front, the 5-spoke wheels and the oval exhaust at the rear.


    TECHNICAL DETAILS: RS 4 AVANT and RS 5
    The amount of speculation surrounding just what would come under the hoods of these two cars ranges considerably. Some say a high-rev V10 or even the twin turbo V10 from the RS 6. Both are wishful thinking. Wolfgang Hatz has definitively told Fourtitude that the V10 will not fit into a production version of the B8 coupe body structure. Hatz absolutely loves the high-rev V10 from the R8 with all its immediate torque, but the added weight in the snout would be considerable even if it were as easy as simply shoe-horning the big V10 in there.

    Another very common and also very perplexing rumor is that of a twin turbo high-rev V8 at around 450-hp. Near as we can tell, the rumor started at CAR and they’re usually a very credible source. While there is a twin-turbocharged 4.0 V8 confirmed for debut in the next A8, there are no immediate plans to fit it in the RS 5. Suggestions in the press of a twin turbocharged high-rev 4.2 to bump power by a mere 30 hp also don’t seem to add up. Adding two turbos for for a gain of thirty horses seems like a lot of work for little payoff.

    We have it on very good word from the highest levels of Audi that the engine will be an updated version of the high-rev V8 developed for the B7 RS 4 and R8 4.2. An additional 30 hp is expected, netting the rumored figure of 450 hp total. Our best guess is that the added power comes from the addition of Valvelift as one senior source has confirmed that the tech it is compatible with the 4.2’s 8,000+ redline.

    Audi’s new 7-speed S tronic is capable of taking all the torque this updated 4.2 has to offer, and high-placed sources have hinted that the transmission is being seriously considered for duty in the pair of RS cars. Whether or not Audi chooses to go exclusively with the dual clutch semi-auto as Nissan’s decided to do with the GTR remains to be seen, but we’re personally hoping that they don’t turn their backs on a standard 6-speed manual.


    Expect RS models to also utilize Audi’s latest Sport Differential as seen in the new S4. Software controls this right-to-left rear differential, so it is feasible that Audi could offer a more aggressive tune that would make the RS versions even more tail-happy and easy-to-drift than the S4 is already.

    As for weight, Audi fitted aluminum fenders and an aluminum hood to the B7-generation RS 4. There’s no reason to believe this won’t be the same for the B8 RS 4 and RS 5 models as both A and S versions of these cars utilize steel now. Such a move would help optimize their front-to-rear weight ratios even more.


    INTERIOR and TRIM
    As with the exterior treatment, one need only look at design details in Audi’s latest RS offerings to know what to expect from the RS 4 Avant and RS 5. Aluminum pedals as seen on the TTRS and satin aluminum finish on the MMI buttons and controls seem logical. So does the fat diameter flat-bottom wheel design with perforated leather that’s become standard fare in RS 6 and TT RS. The logo mark in dyed perforated leather on the door panels from the TT RS and R8 V12 TDI design study would be a great touch.

    The seats themselves may be even more interesting to North Americans. Higher-grade leather and piping could adorn the basic S-car seats as we’ve seen in the past, but there’s even better news regarding the aggressive shell style seats from Recaro. In the past, these seats were out of play for North America because they lacked the proper side airbag equipment needed for this market, but a source at Volkswagen tells us the seats are now in the available column for fitment in cars bound for this side of the pond. While the Volkswagen versions of the Recaro shell seats aren’t exactly the same as those sold by Audi, the qualification should carry over as much of the internal framework is shared. We have yet to confirm their availability, but we wouldn’t be surprised to see these seats as optional kit based on this information.


    WHEN AND WHERE
    There’s a whole industry based around spy photo shooting at the Nurburgring. When a mule turns up testing there, as the RS 5 has, this testing is also a strong signal that the car isn’t far from debut. The next major European or world auto show is the Frankfurt IAA in September and we expect the RS 5 to bow at that time.

    It’s a total guess, but that timeframe would put the RS 5 in the European market by early 2010 and perhaps in the US market by the launch of the 2011 model year in August 2010. This would make sense as the S5 will be migrating to the 3.0T supercharged V6 by that time and the RS 5 will fill the big displacement niche left by the S5 for those who wish to pay the premium.

    Timing for the RS 4 Avant is harder to guess. It’s doubtful that Audi will show the cars at the same time, but the RS 4 can’t be that much further behind. Using our guessed RS 5 timeframe as a model, we’d expect to see the RS 4 at the Geneva Motor Show in 2010 and maybe alongside an RS 5 Cabriolet so that the latter is on the market in time for the summer season.

  12. #192
    Moderator RXBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,838
    sounds like the RS5 engine bay was the biggest reason the RS4 engine couldn't make more power- and that audi held back on the same motor's power output in the V8 R8 simply to leave room for an "upgrade" via ECU tuning later in this model's lifecycle- a la MY 2011. as such, the RS5 engine bay design will allow the RS4 motor to show its true potential. via better intake and exhaust design as well as some ECU reprogramming it should net considerably more power and a bit more torque. a range of 460-480 can be expected. and an even higher redline.
    Past- A4, TT, S4

    Present- R8 V10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •