Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 18 of 32

Thread: Autobild: RS6-trio and Option Auto: RS6 MTM

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    713

    Autobild: RS6-trio and Option Auto: RS6 MTM

    What is an Audi without quattro?

  2. #2
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043
    I was just going to say that...hope the times are better this time.
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    Here we go

    0-100
    MTM 4,2 (702PS, 785Nm)
    Abt 4,5 (700PS, 800Nm)
    Sportec 4,4 (650PS, 760Nm)

    200-300
    MTM 25,8
    Abt 21,5
    Sportec 23,3

    0-200

    mtm 13,0
    sportec 13,0
    abt 13,9

    Mtm is not realy faster than he was bevor 13,7 to 13,0
    Temprature was 20 degres..

    The car is just to heavy

    Compare m5 g power hurican with 730 ps 200-300 time in 16 sec

    But rs6 is the most powerfull and fastest avant.

    Sportec was on 22"
    mtm on 21"
    and abt on 20"

  4. #4
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043
    We all want more, but all I can say is that 0-300 km/h in a 2.2 ton Estate in these times is a VERY good result.

    The difference between 13,0 and 13,7 is more than you can imagine.

    0-300 km/h

    Abt 35,4 secs
    Sportec 36,3
    MTM 38,8


    Compare with 0-300 km/h:

    Porsche Carrera GT (AMS) 34,2 s
    Mercedes SLR (Auto Bild) 34,8 s
    Mercedes SLR (AMS) 36,9 s
    Porsche 997 Turbo (AMS) 40,7 s
    Corvette Z06 (AMS) 41,8 s
    Aston Martin Vanquish S (AMS) 57,1 s

    I am impressed...
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  5. #5
    Moderator Ruergard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,029
    Well, hitting 200 km/h in 13 seconds is damn quick. Hitting 300 km/h in around 35 seconds is even more insane with a 2 ton estate-car. Especially when you consider the size of the wheels..

    I'm with Erik, impressive!

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    1,414
    Quote Originally Posted by audi_ch View Post
    Sportec was on 22"
    mtm on 21"
    and abt on 20"
    Such difference in wheel size is absolutely stupid. Every car should have had exactly the same wheel to compair fairly the performance between the three cars...

    Frederic

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by Erik View Post
    We all want more, but all I can say is that 0-300 km/h in a 2.2 ton Estate in these times is a VERY good result.

    The difference between 13,0 and 13,7 is more than you can imagine.

    0-300 km/h

    Abt 35,4 secs
    Sportec 36,3
    MTM 38,8


    Compare with 0-300 km/h:

    Porsche Carrera GT (AMS) 34,2 s
    Mercedes SLR (Auto Bild) 34,8 s
    Mercedes SLR (AMS) 36,9 s
    Porsche 997 Turbo (AMS) 40,7 s
    Corvette Z06 (AMS) 41,8 s
    Aston Martin Vanquish S (AMS) 57,1 s

    I am impressed...
    Hi Erik

    i do agree with you, it is a fantastic time for an estate, but be carefull with the source, it is sportcars= auto bild, Just remember they tested the new lambo lp560 with 34 sec to 300kmh.

    The same lambo was at nardo speed test with almost same temperature, he made there 40 seks to 300kmh

    the slr did 29 in the same nardo test z06 had 44 due to his long gearing

    Hope on the next nardo is the rs6 involved as well, would be more comparative. A and the new gt2 did 36 sec.

    And i dont believe that a tunned rs6 with wight horsepore ratio witch isnt that good as the porsche gt2, will take him

  8. #8
    Registered User mdk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens-Greece
    Posts
    116
    I am too impressed by the figures but there is something I do not understand.

    Similar power output and torque tuned cars (MTM and ABT) seem to have big differences.
    MTM seems much faster on 0-100 by 0,3 sec and 0,9 sec on 0-200 BUT dramatically slower by almost 5 sec on 200-300.

    Maybe someone could explain reasons for such deviation.

    Thanks,
    Michalis

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    1,414
    Quote Originally Posted by mdk View Post
    I am too impressed by the figures but there is something I do not understand.

    Similar power output and torque tuned cars (MTM and ABT) seem to have big differences.
    MTM seems much faster on 0-100 by 0,3 sec and 0,9 sec on 0-200 BUT dramatically slower by almost 5 sec on 200-300.

    Maybe someone could explain reasons for such deviation.

    Thanks,
    Michalis

    Wheel Diameter from my point of view. It impact greatly performance.

    Frederic

  10. #10
    Registered User snoopra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    US Virgin Islands
    Posts
    1,047
    When we say "wheel size makes a differance", take into consideration that tire profiles can make all three "wheels" the same height, so rim size is not as important as tire size/height.
    2003 RS 6______________________________________________
    Mugello Blue/Silver Interior/Wood Trim/Warm Weather Package/
    LED Tail lights/RNS-E/DVD Video/OEM S5 19's/Custom Painted Calipers/Full CAT-Less, Nonresonated Milltek/APR DV's/
    H-Sport Sway Bars/5 Bar FPR/ABT Aluminum pedals/MTM TCU Chip

    -------Other Rides
    2007 Cadillac Escalade
    2007 Jeep Compass
    2006 Jeep Commander
    2006 Chevy Colorado Reg Cab
    -------

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    Wheel wight

  12. #12
    Registered User mdk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens-Greece
    Posts
    116
    True, wheel weight makes a difference and this should be evident at the 0-100 and 0-200 as well.
    Remind you that MTM (21") was faster in both 0-100 and 0-200 from the ABT (20") but slower at the last stage (200-300) by almost 5 seconds!!!

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    713
    From the moment I read the results I wanted to know what the times would be if they all would run on 20inches! I would never put bigger alloys on a car then that.

    MB
    What is an Audi without quattro?

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by Michaël Barbé View Post
    From the moment I read the results I wanted to know what the times would be if they all would run on 20inches! I would never put bigger alloys on a car then that.

    MB
    abt is on 20"

    Sportec has 650 hp and is faster on 22" than mtm on 21".. a bit strange

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    713
    Quote Originally Posted by audi_ch View Post
    abt is on 20"

    Sportec has 650 hp and is faster on 22" than mtm on 21".. a bit strange
    Indeed... Balsen: any comments on that?


    MB
    What is an Audi without quattro?

  16. #16
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043
    This race would be funny, with a dog in the back (of the Avant)

    0-300 km/h

    Abt 35,4 secs
    Sportec 36,3


    Porsche 997/911 GT2 (AMS) 36,2 s

    BMW-Alpina B6 S (E63) 41,5
    Alpina B6 V8 Kompressor 49,9
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    713
    The scans of the article: one of the first pictures the RS6 R (MTM) looks sooooo GOOD!

    http://www.mtm-online.de/imgneu/pres...19_Bericht.pdf

    MB
    What is an Audi without quattro?

  18. #18
    Moderator Ruergard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,029
    That's one sexy ass...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •