Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Sportauto: Scirocco 2.0 TFI DSG vs. Volvo C30 T5, Nürburgring

  1. #1
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,043

    No 1 Sportauto: Scirocco 2.0 TFI DSG vs. Volvo C30 T5, Nürburgring

    VW Scirocco 2.0 TSI DSG
    V4 turbo, 1.984 liters
    200 PS at 5,100 rpm
    280 Nm at 1,700-5,000 rpm
    100.8 PS/liter

    MSRP: 37,726 EUR as tested

    kerb weight: 1,370 kg
    power-to-weight: 144.9 bhp/ton

    0-100 km/h: 7.0 s
    0-160 km/h: 16.2s
    0-200 km/h: n/a

    Vmax = 233 km/h

    Nurbrugring Nordscleife: 8:46.4 mins.
    18m slalom: 64.6 km/h

    100-0 km/h: 37.3 m

    av. fuel consumtion: 12.1 l/100 km


    Volvo C30 T5
    5-cyl. turbo, 2.521 liters
    230 PS at 5,000 rpm
    320 Nm at 1,500-5,000 rpm
    91.2 PS/liter

    MSRP: 29,250 EUR as tested

    kerb weight: 1,450 kg
    power-to-weight: 158.7 bhp/ton

    0-100 km/h: 7.3 s
    0-160 km/h: 16.9s
    0-200 km/h: n/a

    Vmax = 240 km/h

    Nurbrugring Nordscleife: 8:44.7 mins.
    18m slalom: 62.8 km/h

    100-0 km/h: 39.2 m

    av. fuel consumtion: 11.2 l/100 km


    verdict:
    if they were really as cheap as suggested by the basic list price there would be nothing to say against the VW Scirroc 2.0 TSI DSG and the Volvo C30 T5. But with all the options especially the Scirrocoo is becomg much too expensive. The Volvo might be more powerful, it beats the Scirocco at the track but not in straight-line acceleration, handling and braking. A more direct steering, a different set-up and a better brake would be ebnefitial to the Volvo.
    RS6.com Owner and Admin. The PRISM of RS6.com - Click here to send me an e-mail

  2. #2
    Registered User JavierNuvolari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,830
    The Scirocco it's a very noce ride...but the price seems to high.

  3. #3
    Registered User Leadfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    7,791
    I love the new VW but a Volvo beat it around the ring and it's time was 30 seconds off the Megane. It's a pretty coupe but it is no world beater.
    Search and you will find the truth.

  4. #4
    Registered User AndyBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    BG - SRB
    Posts
    5,099
    I like Scirocco better... It's far away from perfect, but with reasonable options and price, of c', it seems like a nice car.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    339
    The Volvo doesn't even offer the kind of options that the Scirroco does, and you're not forced to tick the box.
    Mazda MX-5 (Miata NB)

  6. #6
    Registered User Lateknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    447
    A slight bias going on here me thinks.
    That must be one 'Loaded' Scirocco for it to be nearly 10K over base list (about 29k euro for a 2.0 tsi DSG - am i right?)

    Dont quite get how a lighter more nimble Scirocco that (just) out-performs the C30 even in a straight line is 2 seconds slower around the 'ring. (??)
    Thats surely thats got to be the driver not getting the best from the VW.
    Have there been any other independant times for the Scirocco on the 'ring?

    Evo mag have a quite interesting test of the Scirocco / C30 / 1 series / RX8 this month.
    The VW humbled the C30 on challenging country roads.
    O.K, the C30s brakes were said to be past their best (it was Evo's long termer), but was still outclassed by the VW.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •