audi r8 acceleration video (camera on board)

[bober3]

check this out... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWDaHyLlk0k



or www.optionauto.net if you want to see another car video

[bober3]

sorry it's www.optionauto.com

[Z07]

13s from 160km/h to 240km/h. Fairly decent. Faster than other testing has led us to believe.

[Leadfoot]

Gauging that the R8 takes 10s to get the 160km/h, then judging on this video the R8 will do a standing 0~300km/h in roughly 53s. I don't know how this compares to a de-limited RS6, RS4, 997 Carerra S or even new M3 but it's still pretty impressive.

[Z07]

It only reaches 290km/h.

However, a 23s 0-240km/h would be about 1s shy of a 997 GT3!

[Leadfoot]

A 23s 0-240km/h would be about 1s shy of a 997 GT3!

I know Autocar tested the R8 and it's 0-150mph time was 26s something, roughly 0.5s slower than both the RS4 and M3. I would has thought the GT3 would have been much quicker than all three of these.

[Z07]

I know Autocar tested the R8 and it's 0-150mph time was 26s something, roughly 0.5s slower than both the RS4 and M3. I would has thought the GT3 would have been much quicker than all three of these.

Autocar made 22s with the GT3 and 26s with the R8. I was only judging by this video, but he may have been wind-assisted or down a slight hill.

[Speedou]

Dudes it is a speedometer. You really can't compare that to magazine times. There can easily be some 10km/h mistake and also video angle can ad some more mistake.

[Iceman]

Dudes it is a speedometer. You really can't compare that to magazine times. There can easily be some 10km/h mistake and also video angle can ad some more mistake.

Also the movie speed can be a factor.

btw, i'm a big fan of the R8 but not his engine.

This Harge H50 Coupe with 550 hp V10 sounds 10x better.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goXaJ...elated&search=

Audi bring it on, 5.2 V10 FSI or TFSI.

Even these S6 and S8 sounds better if cleared of the sub noise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blQGQ...elated&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_vYt...elated&search=

Hans.

[Z07]

Dudes it is a speedometer. You really can't compare that to magazine times. There can easily be some 10km/h mistake and also video angle can ad some more mistake.

I was led to believe that Audi and BMW speeometers are accurate to about 1 or 2km/h????

[Speedou]

I was led to believe that Audi and BMW speeometers are accurate to about 1 or 2km/h????

Definetly not true in speeds above 200. Around 100 it seems to be about 1 or 2. In 250 5-15...

[Z07]

I stand corrected.

[Leadfoot]

Speedou is correct, it's a percentage thing. The faster you go the more the clocks will be out, unless it's been calibrated like the Police speedos have.

[Z07]

Speedou is correct, it's a percentage thing. The faster you go the more the clocks will be out, unless it's been calibrated like the Police speedos have.

That's not always the case. A Koenigsegg CC8S speedo is out by 2mph at 150mph and only 1mph at 200mph. Tyre expansion and all sorts play a part.

[bober3]

does anybody saw the mercedes c 63 amg!!!!!!!!!!

it's limited to 255 kmh but this is scary fast compare to a e92 m3 and b7 rs4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKEGF...elated&search=

[Leadfoot]

I know that there is lots of so-called normal cars which are capable of giving the R8 a bloody nose in a drag race but that's not really the point of this car. It's all about the handling, the looks and the quality of the controls, if it were a watch it would be a Breitling, so what if a Casio can keep better time.

[Z07]

does anybody saw the mercedes c 63 amg!!!!!!!!!!

it's limited to 255 kmh but this is scary fast compare to a e92 m3 and b7 rs4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKEGF...elated&search=

6.2L V8. It's to be expected.