AWD is faster then RWD but as Leadfoot said IT'S WAY MORE EXPENSIVE IN MOTORCROSS AND F1 ETC CAUSE IT'S A VERY COMPLEX SYSTEM VS NORMAL RWD!Why was Audi Quattro system banned from rally's after wining all prizes?!Why?Cause ALWAYS 4WD will beat RWD!
AWD is faster then RWD but as Leadfoot said IT'S WAY MORE EXPENSIVE IN MOTORCROSS AND F1 ETC CAUSE IT'S A VERY COMPLEX SYSTEM VS NORMAL RWD!Why was Audi Quattro system banned from rally's after wining all prizes?!Why?Cause ALWAYS 4WD will beat RWD!
My point were that (no offence Superstardriver) that RWD is only for drifting is a bit of statement!
If it were so why are the majority of cars produced made with RWDrive or FWDrive?
Some part of it come down to the need for it - a KIA dont need RWD or AWD in my opinion but we most also look at the cost aspect of incorporating an AWD system.
My point is that high performance car producers such as M AMG Ferrari etc. should have the money to incorporate such a system and have the costumer base with the money to pay for it - they simply choose not to use such a system - and STILL manage to produce cars with hairraising performance.
A great example would be the M3 CLS - I think a certain member of this board would agree with me LOL
I dont doubt that AWD is the greatest thing out there but its not the only option when you want to go fast
" I Am A Driving God! "
And I thought that the Murcielago was RWD and that only the Gallardo was AWD and not Quattro by the way .
I´ve been told by a Pro driver that a lot of the so called supercars use much more electronic gadgets than we think to get the beasts driveable (and thus less fun for the great drivers out there) .
And I am not talking about BMW , Peace .
When you have eliminated the impossible , whatever remains , however improbable , must be the truth.
..Sherlock Holmes..
all LAMBORGHINI's including Murcielago have 4WD!
Can't wait. 0-60 gotta be in the high 2's. Thats a BAD A$$