View Full Version : New SRT-6
Audihead
March 4th, 2004, 17:46
This is the reason we won't see any supercharged C-class AMG's. This car will eat up the production of the 3.2l supercharged engines from AMG. That's why the V-8 will go into the C-class.
darkseid
March 5th, 2004, 02:59
Every review I have read/watched of the normal 3.2l Crossfire was negative.
So that car better be very much improved if they wan't it to be a competition with the 350Z and Audi TT 3.2, and other cars alike.
Audihead
March 5th, 2004, 16:42
330 Hp should suit all the reviewers just fine. This is a good car but it needed more horsepower, now it has it.
:s4addict: -Bimmerhead
CarbonFibre
March 7th, 2004, 12:07
All the horsepower in the world can't make this car look good. The only one I'd take over the competition would be the Startech (Brabus) V8 version.
http://www.fast-autos.net/startech/startechcrossfire.html
AriciU
March 7th, 2004, 13:18
Check this (http://www.sleepy-fish.com/fish/Top_Gear_Crossfire_hi.wmv) Top Gear review out :D Jeremy Clarkson really bashes the hell outta that Crossfire :D
"It looks like a dog taking a shit"; "maybe it could corner better then a trout"; "there are animals that are faster than this" :)
Real fun video!
Audihead
March 8th, 2004, 17:44
[QUOTE]Originally posted by AriciU
"It looks like a dog taking a shit"; "maybe it could corner better then a trout"; "there are animals that are faster than this" :)
I have to admit since you put it that way, I can't get that visual out of my head. It looks like dog dragging his butt on the carpet! :dance:
:s4addict: -Bimmerhead
gnomik007
March 11th, 2004, 17:09
I just think it is a very ugly car,whatever hp it will have
IT IS UGLY