View Full Version : My RS6 is Flying
avdh
February 15th, 2004, 17:21
0-200 test done with Race-Technology G-box.
May be a bit controversial, but seems accurate thought.
For mph, divide kph by 1.609
http://www.audioimports.com/cars/RS6/AP22-15Feb04-SC.JPG
For more details go to
RS6 0-200 km/h 15 Feb. 04 (http://www.audioimports.com/cars/RS6/Performance/RS6-0-200-15Feb04.htm)
Snow
February 16th, 2004, 11:56
That's fast! :applause:
Finnus
February 16th, 2004, 14:12
Andre,
Have you tuned your Beast or are those stock numbers?
Thanks,
Finnus
:addict:
avdh
February 16th, 2004, 15:38
Originally posted by Finnus
Andre,
Have you tuned your Beast or are those stock numbers?
Thanks,
Finnus
Because of our 100.000 km (62.000 miles) Free maintenance which comes with the car from Audi SA, their cancellation policy for mods, and their witch hunt attitude lately, I have to say the car is stock standard.
In fact, except for the 0-200 the figures are about the same as Audi advertises.
Benman
February 16th, 2004, 21:46
My Beast seems fast as well, but that is DANG fast!:0:
Ben:addict:
Aronis
February 17th, 2004, 00:36
0 - 100 kph 4.77 sec?
That's 0 - 62 mph
I thought the RS 6 was 0-60 in 4.3 sec as Stock????
Where's my stop watch? I'm heading out to check LOL
Benman
February 17th, 2004, 01:43
Originally posted by Aronis
[B]0 - 100 kph 4.77 sec?
That's 0 - 62 mph
I thought the RS 6 was 0-60 in 4.3 sec as Stock????
There have been times in mags ranging from 4.3 - 5.1 for 0-60 times. Obviously depends on A LOT of different factors. But more important, check out his 0-200 kph!!!!! 14.71 is UBER fast! SL55 times!!!:cheers:
Ben:addict:
Erik
February 17th, 2004, 08:38
avdh, sorry to say but that 0-200 km/h seems way too fast.
The fastest RS6 I've seen is one of the ones driven by sport auto.
I did 200 km/h in about 16 seconds. And that car was probably tuned since all other RS6 has ran about 18-19 secs runs.
avdh
February 17th, 2004, 14:26
Erik,
Read carefully my post in reply to Finnus, and try to understand what I am not saying.
The 0-200 is accurate.
Erik
February 17th, 2004, 14:36
Originally posted by avdh
Erik,
Read carefully my post in reply to Finnus, and try to understand what I am not saying.
The 0-200 is accurate.
I see. Then your conclusion is very similar to mine.