PDA

View Full Version : Where does this leave the RS models .... in the dust ...



Andyuk911
September 11th, 2012, 15:42
The S6, 0-60 in 3.7 ....

http://youtu.be/lWtY6QPciw4

Even if the car does this ... I would think this would p155 off the RS owners .. New RS4 and RS5 etc etc

Ruergard
September 11th, 2012, 16:36
DSG + Turbo + Quattro = Winning. I'm a bit unsure on the 3,7 second figure but it's damn quick which is good news for the RS6.

mik15
September 12th, 2012, 18:21
it sets new borders for competition and for the Premium Sport Saloons, just like the RS6 C5 did in 2002...Vorsprung Durch Technik....says it all, it's not just a simple motto! Can't wait for the new RS6 :) !

2jm
September 12th, 2012, 20:37
Even if the car does this ... I would think this would p155 off the RS owners .. New RS4 and RS5 etc etc[/QUOTE]

---

It's not just the numbers. RS models have always been on another level to drive than S-models. With S-model you get around 90% of the performance for about 60% of this price of RS-model.
New RS5 cab, 0-100km/h 4.9sec. The old RS4 cab did it for 4.9sec. Not all models are going forward...

darkop
September 14th, 2012, 05:26
What a stupid commercial! Who cares about 0-60 figures when buying such car...

mik15
September 14th, 2012, 09:22
then what would you care about if 0-60 is not important for an S6?....if you don't care about speed and power then you don't buy an S6, just buy a regular A6 with a 2.0T engine and there you go, you have a very pretty Audi! IMO who is buying the S6, RS6 wants speed and power combined with the other well know qualities that Audi offers, but definitely i wouldn't pay the price for S6/RS6 if it wasn't for the combo the car offers, and speed and 0-60 is an important part of the package!

The Pretender
September 15th, 2012, 00:51
It's a 0 to 60 MPH (96.6 Km/h) time, not a 0 to 100 Km/h time.

AndyBG
September 17th, 2012, 00:34
It's a 0 to 60 MPH (96.6 Km/h) time, not a 0 to 100 Km/h time.

Good point!

Joker
September 18th, 2012, 07:36
It's a 0 to 60 MPH (96.6 Km/h) time, not a 0 to 100 Km/h time.


Good point!

All that means is it will take another 0.1s possibly 0.2s longer, hardly a deal changer in the grand scheme of things.

chewym
September 19th, 2012, 03:03
US magazine times use something called rollout so the 0-60 time is usually at least .3 of a second better than what European publications will show. Eitherway the S6 is quicker than the RS5 to any speed.

Perhaps Audi will counter the next M3 with a RS5 4.0T as the 4.0T didn't end up being much heavier than 4.2 V8 by some elfian magic. Some are saying the next C AMG will use the SLK AMG 5.5 liter naturally aspirated engine but AMG is quite lazy (in a good way) and likes to stick the new 5.5T into everything (aside from the SLK as that would put the SLS to shame) Perhaps RS folks will take it easy as well rather than making a brand new V6 RS motor for the next RS4/5?

Andyuk911
October 1st, 2012, 09:05
arr the video has been removed ... does that give a clue ... ?

xotic
October 1st, 2012, 12:54
new working link here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4c5dlQaS-ik

Andyuk911
October 1st, 2012, 13:29
That's a shame, I thought Audi US had pulled it .. as being a little bit of bull ....