phatfocus
June 10th, 2009, 19:27
My dad and I recently test drove a new RS6 Saloon, with a view to replaceing is current 2004 RS6 avant.
In short we were quite dissapionted. Our main gripe was the gearbox, and I wanted to see if this has cropped up before. We weren't sure, there could have been problem with the gearbox, maybe its just the way it is.
It was very jerky and seemed to be easily confused. For instance, pulling out of our drive and some turnings it kangarood, and when pushing hard in a corner, on one instance suddenly snapped the back end out a bit, perhaps as a result of the gearbox.
The car was better in "manual" mode (like the fact it now blips) , but even then it was sometimes frusrating because it would not consistantly go down a gear before a corner, sometimes refusing top do so.
Overall it seemed to show its weight, very heavy under breaking, and the performace wasn't significantly better, or perhaps as good as we expected. The gearbox in the old car seemed to select the correct gear 9 times out of ten, this one not as often. Also depite the promise we felt the old car is still better for low down response.
Is it just that the new RS6 has been engineered to be an edgier drive with a peakier engine (surely not as its still turbo) ? The old car seems to be more surefooted, predictable and smoother.
Any thoughs? Are we on our own on this one?
In short we were quite dissapionted. Our main gripe was the gearbox, and I wanted to see if this has cropped up before. We weren't sure, there could have been problem with the gearbox, maybe its just the way it is.
It was very jerky and seemed to be easily confused. For instance, pulling out of our drive and some turnings it kangarood, and when pushing hard in a corner, on one instance suddenly snapped the back end out a bit, perhaps as a result of the gearbox.
The car was better in "manual" mode (like the fact it now blips) , but even then it was sometimes frusrating because it would not consistantly go down a gear before a corner, sometimes refusing top do so.
Overall it seemed to show its weight, very heavy under breaking, and the performace wasn't significantly better, or perhaps as good as we expected. The gearbox in the old car seemed to select the correct gear 9 times out of ten, this one not as often. Also depite the promise we felt the old car is still better for low down response.
Is it just that the new RS6 has been engineered to be an edgier drive with a peakier engine (surely not as its still turbo) ? The old car seems to be more surefooted, predictable and smoother.
Any thoughs? Are we on our own on this one?