View Full Version : While logging car I did a 0-100mph run, 11.1seconds stock at 6500ft
Not too far off the claimed 10.7 at sea level, so I was pretty happy. Anyone think I could crack 13s up here in the 1/4 based off that info?
10SecS4
June 9th, 2009, 05:52
Assuming that was done on a level road and you have stock size tires, your RS6 is running 12.85-13.05 @ 106.5-108.5 MPH.
I picked up a second (Ming Blue) RS6 a few months ago which runs exactly the same time as yours from 0-100. I think the best 0-100 time I recorded for my grey RS6 when it was stock was a low 10. That was in sub-freezing temps though. :race:
__________________
Marc aka 10SecS4
http://titsup-racing.com/video/rs6/rs6_sig.jpg
2003 Audi RS6
11.59 @ 118.63 | Video (http://www.titsup-racing.com/video/rs6/rs6_11_8.wmv) | Timeslip (http://titsup-racing.com/video/rs6/rs6_11_59_timeslip_resized.jpg)
Mods: No pre-cats & my own custom tuned ECU/TCU. That's it!
2000 Audi S4
10.73 @ 132.76 | Video (http://titsup-racing.com/video/s4/s4_10_73.wmv) | Timeslip (http://titsup-racing.com/images/s4/s4_10_73.jpg)
Mods: K04s + bolt-ons + weight reduction (bone stock motor!)
Assuming that was done on a level road and you have stock size tires, your RS6 is running 12.85-13.05 @ 106.5-108.5 MPH.
I picked up a second (Ming Blue) RS6 a few months ago which runs exactly the same time as yours from 0-100. I think the best 0-100 time I recorded for my grey RS6 when it was stock was a low 10. That was in sub-freezing temps though. :race:
__________________
Marc aka 10SecS4
2003 Audi RS6
11.59 @ 118.63 | Video (http://www.titsup-racing.com/video/rs6/rs6_11_8.wmv) | Timeslip (http://titsup-racing.com/video/rs6/rs6_11_59_timeslip_resized.jpg)
Mods: No pre-cats & my own custom tuned ECU/TCU. That's it!
2000 Audi S4
10.73 @ 132.76 | Video (http://titsup-racing.com/video/s4/s4_10_73.wmv) | Timeslip (http://titsup-racing.com/images/s4/s4_10_73.jpg)
Mods: K04s + bolt-ons + weight reduction (bone stock motor!)
Just wondering ar VAG Logs accurate, I had one person tell me they are not. If they are accurate and I did 11.1 at 6500ft think a mid ten would be what it can do at sea level?
How goes your progress on your car?
10SecS4
June 9th, 2009, 17:52
The VAG logs are pretty accurate, except they don't factor in rollout. So your time will actually be about 2 tenths of a second quicker to 100 MPH if you're comparing it to numbers published in magazines like C&D.
I don't think you're losing much if any power at your elevation. Like I've mentioned before, the RS6 ECU has an F96 elevation sensor.
Just wondering ar VAG Logs accurate, I had one person tell me they are not. If they are accurate and I did 11.1 at 6500ft think a mid ten would be what it can do at sea level?
How goes your progress on your car?