PDA

View Full Version : Rumors/Speculation RE: New S4



Audiphile
August 7th, 2008, 18:24
From AudiWorld


Virtual Road Test: Next Generation S4

By: Jason Teller (http://www.audiworld.com/info/awcontacts.html)

Late last year we went to press with the latest and greatest information surrounding the B8 S4 (http://www.audiworld.com/news/07/b8-s4-exclusive-preview/). That article, according to inside sources, was accurate as of its publication date. But, Audi has never been known as a static company and lo' and behold there is more to the next generation S4 than we were initially led to believe.

Unsurprisingly nobody will say anything on the record about what led Audi to move away from the reported 3.0-liter TFSI bi-turbo for the S4. Unofficially we have strung together a few versions of the story. The truth is undoubtedly somehwere in the middle, but we'll let the reader be the ultimate judge.

One explanation was that there were competing powerplant development teams and the bi-turbo team was simply much further ahead in its development cycle. As executives pondered how to power the new S4 they were clearly committed to an all new engine (and one that would produce all-important increases in fuel efficiency) and the 3.0-liter TFSI bi-turbo fit that bill quite nicely. Late in the game an alternate group brought forth its completed powerplant which ironically would also be a 3.0-liter, only utilizing compressor supercharging as opposed to turbos (and also denoted a 3.0-liter TFSI). Audi could have realistically gone forward with either design, but the forced-induction won out. More on that later.

A different explanation, although one that produces complete denial from the folks at Audi, is that the brand simply did not want to see history repeat itself with the 2.7T tuning craze. While the previous generation bi-turbo proved to be extensively tunable, it also proved to be a very large warranty headache before it was all said and done. So called turbo demons seemed to lurk in more than a fair share of the 2.7T engines, and a proportionaly higher number of chip-tuned vehicles.

The last explanation we've heard, which seems to be grounded more in truth than in conjecture, is that Audi simply wanted a better torque curve than anything that the previous generation S4's (bi-turbo and naturally aspirated V8, respectively) could possibly muster. Audi's marketing materials on the new 3.0 TFSI (http://www.audiworld.com/news/08/v6-supercharger/) claim "superb power from idle speeds up, spontaneous torque buildup". Note that this article is not about the B8 S4's powerplant - those details have not yet been released - but about the underlying base engine. Either way, the only meaningful change we expect between the 3.0 TFSI in that article and the S4's 3.0 TFSI is the horsepower figure. They speak of 290 hp, but we know that the published figure (on paper at least) will be 330 hp.

Back to why the supercharged 3.0 TFSI won out in the end, sources who spoke to AudiWorld on the condition of annonymity because they were not allowed to speak publicly on the subject have told us that ultimately the reason for this powerplant may be something very simple and unexpected. Audi has never done a production compressor engine and in one person's words, "we just wanted to try new things to keep technically nimble". Clearly Audi's experience with turbos could have easily led to a next-generation bi-turbo but it's very much a been-there-done-that proposition. Pushing in a new direction gives engineers something completely different around which to learn and innovate.

With the evolution of a powerplant being measured in many years there are certainly long lasting rollout expecations around the new 3.0 TFSI. It is expected to do worthy duty in highly tuned stripes in the B8 S4, but we have been told that deployment in everything from the Q5 and Q7 to the A6 is likely. The performance to fuel efficiency ratio is said to be so good that there will indeed be demand throughout the Audi lineup for widespread use.

Driving Experience

To this point we have simply wrapped up some loose ends around the new S4's powerplant without too many new details. Based on many insider contacts and off-the-record conversations, however, we have virtually driven the B8 S4. To be fair we have never set foot inside the vehicle, and yet we know people who have. Here's what they have to say.

First, for longer-term Audi owners who consider themselves in the know about the B5 S4 and all of its awesome tuning possibilities, we would ask you to imagine one of those bi-turbo S4's which has been seriously and thoughtfully built-out to RS4 specs. Here we're talking not only about the engine, but everything else too - the suspension, the brakes and the exhaust. Those modification produce one hell of a performance-capable vehicle, and one that's fun to drive too. Now imagine the B8 S4. Because all of its performance has been well-integrated, well-considered and well-delivered from the factory it is an all around better car than the built S4. Even the most diehard B5 S4 whores will second guess themselves because the B8 S4 delivers all the punch, all the performance and most importantly all the fun in a package which represents two full generations of improvement.

We have been told - by people who would know because they have B7 RS4's in their own personal garages - that the B8 S4 is more fun to drive than the RS4. It is not quite as fast, but all-in-all it is a better drive due to the upgraded brakes, suspension, vectoring quattro system and many other improvements. It is more balanced. It has a more desirable torque curve. It has the all-new interior as seen in the A5 / S5. Everything about the B8 S4 reflects lessons learned and innovation from the track, from previous generation S4's and indeed from Audi's long legacy as a producer of high-perfomance automobiles.

Can the whine of the supercharger be heard when pushing the new S4 hard? The answer is a resounding yes. We have been told that it is apt to become one of the next signatures of the Audi lineup just as the single-frame grille and LED-lighting have come to define the exterior look of the brand's automobiles. It is said to be a glorious, performance-induced whine which gives the driver an auditory signal as to the S4's intentions.

Visually Audi is still putting final touches on the exterior of the S4. The front will include a chrome "S" grille as seen on the next generation S8. LED lighting highlights are expected to play a prominent role as with all current "S" models, although we hear that LED tail lights will not be included. Instead the tail lights will look much like the S5 tail lights which appear to be LED, but are not. The B8 S4 of course adopts the larger, longer stance of its base A4 sibling (which also helps with interior comfort). As previously mentioned the interior adopts the same look as the S5, one of the finest automotive interiors ever conceived.

The S4, like all Audi "S" models, has just a little exhaust burble at idle. We have complained for years that Audi needs to pump-up-the-volume of its exhausts to produce a more aggressive, in-your-face tone, but Audi prefers the subtle route instead. In our virtual drives it became clear that some aftermarket exhaust replacement will be a welcome addition.

Despite some rumors to the contrary, do not expect to see Audi roll out its 7-speed DSG transmission in the B8 S4. While it remains solidly in the development queue, the 7-speed DSG is not ready for prime time at launch. Expect to see it launched a year later.

B8 S4 Debut

Last year we speculated that the B8 S4 would debut perhaps at April's New York Auto Show. That timing was clearly too aggressive and we have now been told with some degree of certainty that the actual debut will take place in Paris in September. For a brand that knows and respects its history, there is a lot going for a Paris debut. The B7 S4 was shown for the first time in Paris in 2004 and the B6 S4 debuted there in 2002. Audi is expected to put the S4 on sale in Europe this coming fall, so the timing simply makes sense from a practical perspective. In terms of when to expect the B8 S4 stateside we have also confirmed that September 2009 is the date for North America. That makes it a 2010 model year vehicle here. Dealers will start taking deposits not long after the car goes on sale in Europe.

Leadfoot
August 7th, 2008, 20:20
I'm a little disappointed that they are saying no S/Tronic at launch, it was one of the star features of the S4, apart from the engine and Quattro3. I sincerely hope that their estimate of a year is wrong and it's a matter of months before it's introduction because BMW are preparing their own version for the normal 3 series to start in 2009.

Everything else sounds about right, especially the driving experience.

The Pretender
August 7th, 2008, 20:53
No S-Tronic @ the start of the S4 would be the worse case scenario.
It would mean it will have a Tip-Tronic Quattro auto box instead.
Not that i mined i would choose the 6 speed manual anyway.

Jarod.

Rutkowsky
August 9th, 2008, 14:55
New engine and Quattro3 plus dual clutch gearbox would make this car a mean machine! It looks like the 335i will get the gearbox first.

Leadfoot
August 9th, 2008, 15:52
New engine and Quattro3 plus dual clutch gearbox would make this car a mean machine! It looks like the 335i will get the gearbox first.

Yeah, I believe so. There is something a miss when the manufacturer which brought dual clutch technology to the main stream have fallen behind the competition. The only saving grace is that torque vectoring will be introduced into Audi cars on the whole before it is with BMW, yeah you heard right, the normal BMW cars with be receiving something very similar in the near future.

The only disappointment I currently have with the S4 (if the most recent pics are right) is it's lack luster looks, this was the same problem with the old S4 and it looks like Audi are repeating the same mistake. I think the approach they took with the TT/S was the right one, make the front nose unique.

doublevanos
August 10th, 2008, 18:16
Yeah, I believe so. There is something a miss when the manufacturer which brought dual clutch technology to the main stream have fallen behind the competition. The only saving grace is that torque vectoring will be introduced into Audi cars on the whole before it is with BMW, yeah you heard right, the normal BMW cars with be receiving something very similar in the near future.

The only disappointment I currently have with the S4 (if the most recent pics are right) is it's lack luster looks, this was the same problem with the old S4 and it looks like Audi are repeating the same mistake. I think the approach they took with the TT/S was the right one, make the front nose unique.

BMW already introduced it on their new X6.

peixe01
August 10th, 2008, 18:45
yep thats true

Leadfoot
August 10th, 2008, 18:49
BMW already introduced it on their new X6.

I think you miss my point, I said that Audi will introduce torque vectoring in their entire awd ranges before BMW introduce it in their entire rwd cars as well as the awd ones too.

I knew full well that X6 got the jump on Audi, as always it seems.:noshake:

PetrolDave
August 11th, 2008, 10:52
I think you miss my point, I said that Audi will introduce torque vectoring in their entire awd ranges before BMW introduce it in their entire rwd cars as well as the awd ones too.

There was an item in Autocar a few months ago quoting one of their sources at Audi as saying that their torque vectoring system had significant design problems and had been "sent back to R&D" so its introduction will be delayed several years.

Leadfoot
August 11th, 2008, 12:01
There was an item in Autocar a few months ago quoting one of their sources at Audi as saying that their torque vectoring system had significant design problems and had been "sent back to R&D" so its introduction will be delayed several years.

I never heard that one and I'm a little surprised if true that no one has heard similar rumours. One know it's been in the development stage for at least 2 years now and was fully expecting it's introduction with the S4 with the roll out to most of the other there after.

Jarod, have you heard of this new development/problem?

The Pretender
August 11th, 2008, 12:19
Jarod, have you heard of this new development/problem?
Yes, there is a problem with the way it's working, something to do with slow reaction or so.
It has been send back to R&D to be reworked.

Jarod.

Leadfoot
August 11th, 2008, 16:01
Yes, there is a problem with the way it's working, something to do with slow reaction or so.
It has been send back to R&D to be reworked.

Jarod.

I'm really getting out of touch, I haven't heard a single thing about this. Very disappointing.:nana:

Benman
August 11th, 2008, 18:11
Unsurprisingly nobody will say anything on the record about what led Audi to move away from the reported 3.0-liter TFSI bi-turbo for the S4.

A different explanation, although one that produces complete denial from the folks at Audi, is that the brand simply did not want to see history repeat itself with the 2.7T tuning craze.

I'd actually believe that explaination...



First, for longer-term Audi owners who consider themselves in the know about the B5 S4 and all of its awesome tuning possibilities, we would ask you to imagine one of those bi-turbo S4's which has been seriously and thoughtfully built-out to RS4 specs...

Even the most diehard B5 S4 whores will second guess themselves because the B8 S4 delivers all the punch, all the performance and most importantly all the fun in a package which represents two full generations of improvement.

We have been told - by people who would know because they have B7 RS4's in their own personal garages - that the B8 S4 is more fun to drive than the RS4. It is not quite as fast, but all-in-all it is a better drive due to the upgraded brakes, suspension, vectoring quattro system and many other improvements. It is more balanced. It has a more desirable torque curve. It has the all-new interior as seen in the A5 / S5.

At the risk of being called "Mr Party Pooper", I doubt it. The B5 is one of the funnest Audis I have ever driven. The potential is mind blowing. There are several times where I miss mine. I think the real upgrade is the interior...





Can the whine of the supercharger be heard when pushing the new S4 hard? The answer is a resounding yes.
I've never liked the supercharger sound, it is terrible. Turbos sound far better. Turbos are also far more economical! The B5 I had was modded with the GIAC chip, lightweight flywheel, ceramic clutch, etc... and if driven prudently, it returned 30mpg, something the new supercharged S4 will never get. Hell, even the :rs6kiss: can return 24mpg if driven prudently on the highway. I am completely bummed the new S4 will be supercharged....:cry: If I want another very fun to drive Audi, I guess I will need to get another modded B5.:noshake:

Ben:addict:

The Pretender
August 12th, 2008, 11:00
Here is the first picture of the 290 hp V6 3.0TFSI engine.

http://www.km77.com/00/audi/a6/2009/gra/200.jpg

Both black plastic covers will be made out of Carbon Fibre by the S4.

Jarod.

chewym
August 14th, 2008, 04:22
What does the carbon fiber add except style? I don't think it's going to save any weight. I guess it's nice anyways evem if it doesn't really add much.

You can also see that the supercharger/intake on the 3.0TFSI doesn't really go up much higher than the regular intake on the 3.2 V6.

The Pretender
August 14th, 2008, 10:47
You can also see that the supercharger/intake on the 3.0TFSI doesn't really go up much higher than the regular intake on the 3.2 V6.
that's the hole point why Audi choose the Supercharger solution, the engine stay as compact as it already is.


Jarod.

RXBG
August 14th, 2008, 13:59
i am still wondering big time what the difference between the two engines will be. it would be extremely neat if the S4's had a turbo in there too. but perhaps it'll just have a slightly more powerful SC.

The Pretender
August 14th, 2008, 14:47
i am still wondering big time what the difference between the two engines will be. it would be extremely neat if the S4's had a turbo in there too. but perhaps it'll just have a slightly more powerful SC.
The S4 will have a more power full version of this engine.
The question is will it be more power with the same SC size or will there be a bigger SC on it to produce more power. ?

Jarod.

M3 owner
August 16th, 2008, 23:43
I agree w/ everything u have said Ben.

chewym
August 17th, 2008, 08:38
I'd actually believe that explaination...



At the risk of being called "Mr Party Pooper", I doubt it. The B5 is one of the funnest Audis I have ever driven. The potential is mind blowing. There are several times where I miss mine. I think the real upgrade is the interior...



I've never liked the supercharger sound, it is terrible. Turbos sound far better. Turbos are also far more economical! The B5 I had was modded with the GIAC chip, lightweight flywheel, ceramic clutch, etc... and if driven prudently, it returned 30mpg, something the new supercharged S4 will never get. Hell, even the :rs6kiss: can return 24mpg if driven prudently on the highway. I am completely bummed the new S4 will be supercharged....:cry: If I want another very fun to drive Audi, I guess I will need to get another modded B5.:noshake:

Ben:addict:

EPA says 15/22 for the B5 S4. Car and Driver says 0-60 in 5.5 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 14.2@97. I am sure the B8 S4 will easily best those numbers. The 3.2 V6 B8 A4 is actually quicker in the quarter mile and has the better fuel economy. The Audi supercharger is very economical. The A6 actually gets better fuel economy in the supercharger version compared to the regular V6.

Benman
August 18th, 2008, 18:53
EPA says 15/22 for the B5 S4. Car and Driver says 0-60 in 5.5 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 14.2@97. I am sure the B8 S4 will easily best those numbers. The 3.2 V6 B8 A4 is actually quicker in the quarter mile and has the better fuel economy. The Audi supercharger is very economical. The A6 actually gets better fuel economy in the supercharger version compared to the regular V6.

EPA may very well quote that, but I know what I got. ;) I am also thinking the EPA will not likely quote higher than for the B8 S4.

As for speed, the B5 "stock" is not what I was comparing to the upcoming B8 S4. A modded (apples to oranges, I know) B5 will be every bit as quick (or quicker depending on the extent) as the B8.

Again, sorry for being a party pooper, but I believe the real reason they are going supercharging instead of TT is for simple warranty/modification issues.

Ben:addict:

Marv
August 18th, 2008, 21:47
Again, sorry for being a party pooper, but I believe the real reason they are going supercharging instead of TT is for simple warranty/modification issues.


You may be right but also consider if the new B8 RS4 stays with high rev normally aspirated engine then you can't put TT in the S4 - RS4 buyers won't like to be overtaken by modded S4 cars :hahahehe:

Benman
August 18th, 2008, 22:28
but also consider...

I think you're on to something. But sad that BMW could do it with the 335i (having immense "mod" potential) and M3, but not Audi...:nono:

Ben:addict:

The Pretender
August 18th, 2008, 22:30
I think you're on to something. But sad that BMW could do it with the 335i (having immense "mod" potential) and M3, but not Audi...:nono:

Ben:addict:
Next gen M3 will have a inline 6 turbo.

Jarod.

Benman
August 18th, 2008, 22:34
Next gen M3 will have a inline 6 turbo.

Jarod.

I thought that was just a rumor? Is it confirmed?!? If so... :applause: :bow:

Ben:addict:

chewym
August 18th, 2008, 22:52
EPA may very well quote that, but I know what I got. ;) I am also thinking the EPA will not likely quote higher than for the B8 S4.

As for speed, the B5 "stock" is not what I was comparing to the upcoming B8 S4. A modded (apples to oranges, I know) B5 will be every bit as quick (or quicker depending on the extent) as the B8.

Again, sorry for being a party pooper, but I believe the real reason they are going supercharging instead of TT is for simple warranty/modification issues.

Ben:addict:

That's possible, but the supercharger does allow for very good packaging (as the photo shows) and not that much weight gain. And Audi is saying that fuel economy will be better. The S4 might end up with about the same fuel economy as the regular A4. Even the old EPA ratings showed only 17/23 for the B5 S4. I think the B8 will get at least that with the new (reduced) EPA ratings.

And removing the problem of people modding cars and then complaining that their Audi is not reliable is just another bonus, that comes especially handy in the US.

The Pretender
August 18th, 2008, 22:59
I'm sure we will see 400+ hp tuned B8 S4's in the near future.

Jarod.

Leadfoot
August 19th, 2008, 12:14
I'm sure we will see 400+ hp tuned B8 S4's in the near future.

Jarod.

I'm unfamiliar with supercharge technology but I understand that to produce a figure of 400hp at the crank the engine is really producing around 500hp because of the power needed to drive the supercharger itself. If this is true then sure 400hp at the crank is approaching the limits of this engine?

Turbocharging may have been the easier and more productive route to have taken from a pure performance view point but I admire Audi for choosing the SC option. It shows that handling and weight are very much at the forefront of the mind.

Benman
August 19th, 2008, 18:17
It shows that handling and weight are very much at the forefront of the mind. But last I heard, SC is just as heavy as TC? And more, with TC, the turbos are mounted lower, whereas the SC is mounted on top of the motor. This would make distribution weight worse, no?

Ben:addict:

Leadfoot
August 19th, 2008, 20:00
But last I heard, SC is just as heavy as TC? And more, with TC, the turbos are mounted lower, whereas the SC is mounted on top of the motor. This would make distribution weight worse, no?

Ben:addict:


It would depend on where the turbos ended up in the engine bay, I know they were low in the RS6 but that may be different in the S4 engine bay. Also the SC engine would be lighter than a twin turbo version, possibly as much as 20Kgs, whether that would amount to make in the grand scheme of things is debatable but every little counts in my book.

P.S.
Here's us discussing the merits of this engine in the S4 and no one outside of Audi has ever set foot in it, never mind driven the thing. I think we all need a little faith.

JavierNuvolari
August 19th, 2008, 20:18
But last I heard, SC is just as heavy as TC? And more, with TC, the turbos are mounted lower, whereas the SC is mounted on top of the motor. This would make distribution weight worse, no?

Ben:addict:

Indeed, I believe it messes things up because of the centre of gravity and stuff.

Leadfoot
August 19th, 2008, 20:29
Indeed, I believe it messes things up because of the centre of gravity and stuff.

Don't you think it would be best to wait and see how the thing handles before debating on whether it was a wrong decision to use SC or not. ;)

crespo
August 19th, 2008, 20:44
Unless you're an F1 driver (and even then...), stop kidding yourselves in believing you can tell the difference weight distribution-wise between two engines you've never even SEEN, let alone driven.

This cinycism is ridiculous (OMGZ! the B8 S4 will be 5% less fuel efficient! WHAT A WASTE!!).

HAVE FAITH. Audi know what they are doing.

crespo
August 19th, 2008, 20:46
And if we're still being pessimistic, I'd bet anyone that a modern supercharged engine is lighter, more fuel efficient, and less complex than the modern turbocharged equivalent.

chewym
August 19th, 2008, 21:15
I'm unfamiliar with supercharge technology but I understand that to produce a figure of 400hp at the crank the engine is really producing around 500hp because of the power needed to drive the supercharger itself. If this is true then sure 400hp at the crank is approaching the limits of this engine?

Turbocharging may have been the easier and more productive route to have taken from a pure performance view point but I admire Audi for choosing the SC option. It shows that handling and weight are very much at the forefront of the mind.

I don't think you will need 100 horsepower to run the small supercharger on the 3.0TFSI. A giant supercharger on a top fuel dragster supposedly uses 900, but that supercharger is way huger than the one on the Audi.

Benman
August 20th, 2008, 00:07
Crespo & Leadie,

Don't get me wrong, I do see your points.

I dislike superchargers for a simple, selfish reason: they are not as mod friendly as turbos, plain and simple. This is again, IMHO one of the main reasons Audi seems to be going away from it. From a manufacture's point, it makes total sense. From a fanboy who loves turbos, it is a stake through the chest...

Ben:addict:

crespo
August 20th, 2008, 01:15
Now that I can wholeheartedly understand. You have my sympathy.

Leadfoot
August 20th, 2008, 12:25
I too am a turbo fan but we all need a little faith, we are debating a car and engine prior to sampling it. For all we know this could be a car that's everybit as good to drive as the B7 RS4 and for a heck of a lot less money.

Damienr8
August 21st, 2008, 14:57
Sorry to deviate from the actual topic at hand but i am also pretty unfamiliar with Superchargers.

A couple of weeks ago i visitied my friend might in Eastchester, NY and checked out his 500hp mustang cobra. He installed a new supercharger a couple of months ago (dont know what manufacturer/model) and while i have always thought that they made most of their power between a strict rpm range (ie between 2500 and 6500rpm). On his car, power was still coming on strong up till 8000 rpm. Isnt that a pretty high figure for a supercharged engine?

He's had the supercharger on for over 6K miles and no problems.....

Mr Balsen
August 21st, 2008, 15:35
I'd actually believe that explaination...



At the risk of being called "Mr Party Pooper", I doubt it. The B5 is one of the funnest Audis I have ever driven. The potential is mind blowing. There are several times where I miss mine. I think the real upgrade is the interior...



I've never liked the supercharger sound, it is terrible. Turbos sound far better. Turbos are also far more economical! The B5 I had was modded with the GIAC chip, lightweight flywheel, ceramic clutch, etc... and if driven prudently, it returned 30mpg, something the new supercharged S4 will never get. Hell, even the :rs6kiss: can return 24mpg if driven prudently on the highway. I am completely bummed the new S4 will be supercharged....:cry: If I want another very fun to drive Audi, I guess I will need to get another modded B5.:noshake:

Ben:addict:

The next S4 might be the only supercharged S4. And the following one might have a twin turbo V6 like the B5...

Frederic

Leadfoot
August 21st, 2008, 18:52
The next S4 might be the only supercharged S4. And the following one might have a twin turbo V6 like the B5...

Frederic

No surprise there then, especially when you consider it (the S4 I mean) has had three different engine options it the last three versions (B6 and B7 when only a face-lift).

Benman
August 21st, 2008, 20:30
The next S4 might be the only supercharged S4. And the following one might have a twin turbo V6 like the B5...

Frederic
Well then, dang nabbit! Why even bother with the charger if they know they'll likely be just going right back to turbo?!?!?!?:doh: :vhmmm: :doh:

Ben:addict:

011
September 13th, 2008, 23:24
From tuning point of view,only important thing will be to find out does SC spins on its limit (that is 15000 revs), this is fairly easy to find out, it is ratio between crank pulley and SC pulley x revs of engine. If it will be on its limit than there is nothing to do to rise up Hp-aside of changing for bigger SC,if possible to fit it there.

Leadfoot
September 13th, 2008, 23:55
No matter what you do to these cars, be it turboed or supercharged, when you tune them a bit of their drivability goes in the process.