PDA

View Full Version : Press Event: RS6 Avant



Qisha
January 22nd, 2008, 13:35
Dear Friends,

since yesterday the Press is able to Testdrive the new RS6 Avant in Le Castellet, Grand Prix Racetrack Paul Ricard.

All test cars are equipped with Pirelli PZero Tires, that are certified for OE use.

You can expect the first released Test Details within the next days.

Qisha

Marv
January 22nd, 2008, 14:51
I'm really looking forward to this - let's see if this car is worth the expected premium over M5 and E63 AMG

Qisha, do you know if Press can be drive it on the road also. As much as I'd like to believe I would spend all my time driving it on a track this will be a pretty limited test.

roadrunner
January 22nd, 2008, 14:57
Qisha, do you know if some testcars are equipped with the Sport suspension + and ceramic brakes?

cheers
seb.

DuckWingDuck
January 22nd, 2008, 16:41
Sigh, it's events like these that I wish I still had my press access!

Michaël Barbé
January 22nd, 2008, 16:48
AHAAA!! That's exciting news!
Wil there be a new thread when this video is out or will this be placed in this one here?

MB
:rs6kiss:

Ruergard
January 22nd, 2008, 18:48
This is interesting new, will be very funny to see what the press thinks about our new beast! :addict:

AndyBG
January 23rd, 2008, 01:10
Is there any of our members atending these tests, maybe... ?

artur777
January 23rd, 2008, 14:23
It is very interesting to know the test drive results.
What does the press say about - is it better than M5 or E63 AMG?
Does anybody know something about that?

KresoF1
January 23rd, 2008, 14:32
It is just first offical Press event for RS6 Avant. German AMS will receive their RS6 Avant test car in mid February so, you can expect first full tests(with measurements) in Mid March...

Erik
January 24th, 2008, 08:12
Is anything up on the internet from this yet?

Kliko61
January 24th, 2008, 12:23
yesssss, the first video is here

http://www.autojunk.nl/clips/view/135934

It sounds veryyyyyyyy niiiiiiiiiceeee :addict: :addict:

By the way, I'm one of the new guys on this forum without a RS6 :( but I'm still a big fan

greetings

Thrives
January 24th, 2008, 12:57
:bow:

Look at the speedo from 120 to 200 :trash::burnout:

Qisha
January 24th, 2008, 13:29
Dear Friends,

a handful of cars do have the Ceramic Brake option, most do have the SS+, the Sportexhaust option is fitted as well.

This event is thought to give a first driving impression to the press, well, under safe cirumstances (racetrack).

Qisha

PS: notice how quick the tiptronic is...

Leadfoot
January 24th, 2008, 13:51
I could live with that.

It does seem to put on speed quite quickly so I think the M5 members of the group might be wise to take note. :hahahehe:

AndyBG
January 24th, 2008, 13:52
RS 6... Its fantastic... !!!

Kliko61
January 24th, 2008, 14:07
leadfoot

it seems like the rs6 is faster to 200 km/h than the m5, just imagine what it will do to the m5 with a remap :D:D:D...

I think you were right in your comments as always :D

artur777
January 24th, 2008, 14:46
What are the real figures of acceleration from 0-100 and 0-200???
Very interesting to understand the possible upsight and comapre it to M5 and E63

RXBG
January 24th, 2008, 15:09
where is the sedan people?????????????

AndyBG
January 24th, 2008, 15:48
where is the sedan people?????????????

Couple of months more..., I think... :confused:

But, Avant is GREAT !!!!

KresoF1
January 24th, 2008, 16:12
Pics...
http://www.autoblog.nl/singapore/?gallery=0%20Reviews/Audi/RS6%20Paul%20Ricard

+44 Dave
January 24th, 2008, 16:42
That sounds so so so so so good. Will be a space ship beyond 60mph (100kmh) and wont be slow before 60 either!

Husky3
January 24th, 2008, 17:02
would love to see it in black!

Ruergard
January 24th, 2008, 17:37
THE NOISE!!! :bow:

My god it sounds good, the tiptronic seems very fast indeed.. just like rest of the car! :addict:

Rutkowsky
January 24th, 2008, 17:50
Awesome!! I wonder what a remap can do to power or will there be plus version at all?

HKS786
January 24th, 2008, 19:30
would love to see it in black!

http://www.rs6.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5638&d=1192906560
http://www.rs6.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5640&d=1192906560
http://www.rs6.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5641&d=1192906560
http://www.rs6.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5639&d=1192906560

Georgious86
January 24th, 2008, 21:31
hey frieeeendsss,I'm also audi fan,but i can't watch the video!!!:w: after volvo advert is over,on 5 second it stops and turns off.why???please help

Ricoloco
January 24th, 2008, 21:32
Dont really think that black makes the car justice. You dont really see the shape of the car, needs to be brighter. Monza or Suzuka makes the trick.

Audifan92
January 24th, 2008, 22:24
RXBGs right!
Where is the Sedan??!!
I posted a thread a while back of a spy version of the sedan
And i think that was the real thing

itisme
January 24th, 2008, 23:18
THE NOISE!!! :bow:

My god it sounds good, the tiptronic seems very fast indeed.. just like rest of the car! :addict:

what are you referring to? i don't see any soundclip or movie :vhmmm:

Leadfoot
January 24th, 2008, 23:22
what are you referring to? i don't see any soundclip or movie :vhmmm:

http://www.autojunk.nl/clips/view/135934

Turn the volume right up and enjoy. :love2:

itisme
January 24th, 2008, 23:28
http://www.autojunk.nl/clips/view/135934

Turn the volume right up and enjoy. :love2:


oh my god.. that was amazing :applause:


:rs6kiss:

HKS786
January 24th, 2008, 23:48
Dont really think that black makes the car justice. You dont really see the shape of the car, needs to be brighter. Monza or Suzuka makes the trick.

I say that about most cars! Sure black is classy and stealthy, but it hides bodywork and detail in my opinion.

Julz RS4
January 25th, 2008, 03:24
New pictures set. :addict:

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/3751/170421high122232lofh4.th.jpg (http://img132.imageshack.us/my.php?image=170421high122232lofh4.jpg) http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/8112/170542high122187lozy6.th.jpg (http://img132.imageshack.us/my.php?image=170542high122187lozy6.jpg) http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/8840/170553high122935lohd2.th.jpg (http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?image=170553high122935lohd2.jpg) http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/7543/170604high122865loen4.th.jpg (http://img299.imageshack.us/my.php?image=170604high122865loen4.jpg)

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/9999/172545high122568logt1.th.jpg (http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?image=172545high122568logt1.jpg) http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/9139/172636high122635locf5.th.jpg (http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?image=172636high122635locf5.jpg) http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/7659/172697high12255lohn9.th.jpg (http://img299.imageshack.us/my.php?image=172697high12255lohn9.jpg) http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/824/172718high122402lomz2.th.jpg (http://img299.imageshack.us/my.php?image=172718high122402lomz2.jpg)

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/4089/173429high122859loab7.th.jpg (http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?image=173429high122859loab7.jpg) http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/4768/1735210high1221165lozd9.th.jpg (http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1735210high1221165lozd9.jpg) http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/3964/1737011high122574loei1.th.jpg (http://img132.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1737011high122574loei1.jpg)

KarlMarx
January 25th, 2008, 09:02
Thanks Julz - just what the Doctor ordered for a Friday.

Husky3
January 25th, 2008, 09:31
Thanks for the photos in black.
I know that there are only 5 "standard" colours for the RS6.
Misano red, Monterey green, Mugello blue, Phantom black, Sepang blue.

What does the community think of these colours? Which one would you take?

HKS786
January 25th, 2008, 10:05
Thanks for the photos in black.
I know that there are only 5 "standard" colours for the RS6.
Misano red, Monterey green, Mugello blue, Phantom black, Sepang blue.

What does the community think of these colours? Which one would you take?

Sepang Blue for me, but I wont lie - It looks GREAT in Masano red too!

http://rs6.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5948&d=1199290950
http://rs6.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5949&d=1199290950
http://rs6.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=5950&d=1199290950

Leadfoot
January 25th, 2008, 10:07
Agreed with you on that HKZ786.

AndyBG
January 25th, 2008, 13:35
Missano Rot, bingo !

It looks GREAT !

Rutkowsky
January 25th, 2008, 15:03
looking at the acceleration again - 1. it seems that SMG is faster 2. to see which car is faster, you need a real world comparison. My guess is that RS6 will have the edge..

+44 Dave
January 25th, 2008, 15:12
looking at the acceleration again - 1. it seems that SMG is faster 2. to see which car is faster, you need a real world comparison. My guess is that RS6 will have the edge..

Yeh you would think the extra 80-100bhp the RS6 has might just make a slight difference. Bit of a no brainer.

Jani
January 25th, 2008, 15:16
Having driven an M6, below 150 km/h all you really get is the traction control light. So real world acceleration is another thing than theoretic values.

Leadfoot
January 25th, 2008, 15:49
looking at the acceleration again - 1. it seems that SMG is faster 2. to see which car is faster, you need a real world comparison. My guess is that RS6 will have the edge..

Not wanting to start an argument but it's impossible to know which is quicker in both shift times and acceleration. The gearbox comparison is very tricky to know for sure because one is an auto and the other a manual, the auto may give the impression that it's slower because of the way it changes but in reality this maybe the quicker of the two, the auto in the RS6 is mean to shift in 80ms, is this quicker than SMG3.:vhmmm:

The acceleration is again tricky to know for sure, my gut says that if it's got an extra 80~100hp more and ever more torque everywhere in the rev range then it must be the quicker. But until the two are put side by side no-one apart from Audi themselves know the outcome.

But I bet I know someone here who does. ;)

Kliko61
January 25th, 2008, 16:03
And here another video guys :D:D

http://www.autoweek.nl/videodisp.php?id=756&cat=1&cache=no

Looks like Dutch autobloggers are the first sites with videos...

jonas21
January 25th, 2008, 18:46
holy #$%*! that sound is insane. i want one badly!!
if it accelerated this fast beeing stock i wonder if you will need to buy wings if you are going to have it chipped at MTM etc.

KresoF1
January 25th, 2008, 18:51
Very nice report in German with good pics...
http://www.evo-cars.de/fahrberichte/drivenaudirs6avant.php

itisme
January 25th, 2008, 20:27
nice,thx

http://www.evo-cars.de/fahrberichte/95e0919a300f70f21/l026.jpg

:heart: :love2: :rs6kiss: :love2: :heart:

vec110
January 25th, 2008, 22:51
I cant wait for this to come state side! I want the advant as well!

ZeroCool
January 25th, 2008, 23:11
Guys - the A6 Sedan i think would have the Facelift - when the RS6 is shown...

Did you saw this pics?

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/fotos/foto-shows/erlkoenige/mpsfshw_show_503553_13999.hbs

For me it's the first time that i see the facelifted Sedan from behind. Interesting design...

p.s. thats maybe also the reason why they presented the Avant first...

+44 Dave
January 25th, 2008, 23:13
Not wanting to start an argument but it's impossible to know which is quicker in both shift times and acceleration. The gearbox comparison is very tricky to know for sure because one is an auto and the other a manual, the auto may give the impression that it's slower because of the way it changes but in reality this maybe the quicker of the two, the auto in the RS6 is mean to shift in 80ms, is this quicker than SMG3.:vhmmm:

The acceleration is again tricky to know for sure, my gut says that if it's got an extra 80~100hp more and ever more torque everywhere in the rev range then it must be the quicker. But until the two are put side by side no-one apart from Audi themselves know the outcome.

But I bet I know someone here who does. ;)

It seems un thinkable that with an extra 80-100bhp + lots more torque and Quattro and all the other technical such, DSG was the first dual clutch system so that must count for something. I just dont know how it could be slower than the M5, let alone the M6 :vhmmm:

The M5 must have been the development benchmark so it must be faster, even in Avant form.

Will be pretty dissapointed still if the 0-60 time isnt better than the M5 even if the RS6 is a better car :hihi:

Rutkowsky
January 25th, 2008, 23:37
It seems un thinkable that with an extra 80-100bhp + lots more torque and Quattro and all the other technical such, DSG was the first dual clutch system so that must count for something. I just dont know how it could be slower than the M5, let alone the M6 :vhmmm:

The M5 must have been the development benchmark so it must be faster, even in Avant form.

Will be pretty dissapointed still if the 0-60 time isnt better than the M5 even if the RS6 is a better car :hihi:

:vhmmm: Slower than M5 let alone M6? M6 is faster than M5. As for the gear change speed, SMG does it @ 65ms.
And what is the weight difference between them two? 200kg (!!!) and that's a lot as far as handlings concerned. I also noticed top speed on speedo is @ 320km/h whereas M5's 330km/h. My feeling is that, up to 250km/h RS6 will be quicker but it is all just pure guess work
:cheers:

Rutkowsky
January 25th, 2008, 23:40
nice,thx

http://www.evo-cars.de/fahrberichte/95e0919a300f70f21/l026.jpg

:heart: :love2: :rs6kiss: :love2: :heart:

:vhmmm:
I don't really like this rear shot. looks a bit like a cross with an All-Road. But no doubt, seeing the thing in metal is something else

A.N.T.E.
January 26th, 2008, 00:14
Guys - the A6 Sedan i think would have the Facelift - when the RS6 is shown...

Do you think something like this!? :vgrumpy:


http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/9342/l000rv4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

It's Photoshop(not very good, but...), as you can see...;)

AndyBG
January 26th, 2008, 01:47
Guys - the A6 Sedan i think would have the Facelift - when the RS6 is shown...

Did you saw this pics?

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/fotos/foto-shows/erlkoenige/mpsfshw_show_503553_13999.hbs

For me it's the first time that i see the facelifted Sedan from behind. Interesting design...

p.s. thats maybe also the reason why they presented the Avant first...

I expected those taillights to be wider, like on the A4...

ZeroCool
January 26th, 2008, 11:40
Do you think something like this!? :vgrumpy:


http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/9342/l000rv4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

It's Photoshop(not very good, but...), as you can see...;)

Yes, i thought something like this - but the front is nothing special - check out the pics from the back of the A6 Sedan ;)

Ruergard
January 26th, 2008, 16:24
Not wanting to start an argument but it's impossible to know which is quicker in both shift times and acceleration. The gearbox comparison is very tricky to know for sure because one is an auto and the other a manual, the auto may give the impression that it's slower because of the way it changes but in reality this maybe the quicker of the two, the auto in the RS6 is mean to shift in 80ms, is this quicker than SMG3.:vhmmm:

The acceleration is again tricky to know for sure, my gut says that if it's got an extra 80~100hp more and ever more torque everywhere in the rev range then it must be the quicker. But until the two are put side by side no-one apart from Audi themselves know the outcome.

But I bet I know someone here who does. ;)

The SMG3 shifts at 65ms. So it's a little bit quicker, but the Audi has more power and torque. My guess is that it will be close, very close. :addict:

audi_ch
January 26th, 2008, 18:11
in the german forum rs-quattro.de

members stopped the rs6 in 15,5 sec, and there are rumors around from well informed people that he is hardly matching the 14,9.

i dont know if some of you are parts in this forum, but in generaly some good informed people with technical know how.

Any way we will see, but due to the wihght and quattro loss i think personaly the 100-200 will be slower than the m5.

Dont think that 80 hp officialy, and 100 nm more can catch 200kg more witght.

But lets hope

ZeroCool
January 26th, 2008, 18:49
Don't you think that AUDI also bought an M5 to test their RS6 against the M5 .. i'm sure - because there were also spy-pics with RS6 and M5 somewhere in the north...

So if they had the car to test them - i'm sure that they won't bring a car - which is slower than the M5 ... let's wait for the first tests and see

Kliko61
January 26th, 2008, 20:13
if the RS6 is going to be slower than the m5, it will very very disappoint me and many other I think:confused: :confused:

It is just unbelievable, because it has +100 horsepower and 120 Nm over the M5 and if the M5 is going to be biturboed in the future, Audi really can forget it....

Let's hope this will not happen

Georgious86
January 26th, 2008, 20:28
You are 100% right,audi won't bring Rs6 which is slower then M5,i think we should think how much faster Rs6 is against M5,look...old M5 400bhp and old Rs6 has more 50 bhp, it's heavier(50 kg if i'm not mistaken) and also is what audi haters critics audi for Quattro.but what all of us know???
0-100km/h Rs6 is faster,maybe yeah a bit but still it's FASTER!!!
0-200km/h Rs6 is faster as well. so this RS6 i'm sure will be faster then M5.
can you tell me when the first test is going to be???

chewym
January 26th, 2008, 20:32
Chill. Wait for the test results. The RS6 will be fine. It makes its peak torque from 1,500 to 6,000+ RPM, which means that the Audi torque figure is lower than it really is. Same with peak horsepower from 6,250-6,700 RPM. And if anything, compare RS6 Avant with the M5 wagon.

audi_ch
January 26th, 2008, 22:07
a lot of speculations

witch member here had it heart it self by the quattro gmbh that one of there master goal with the new rs6 is to beat a bmw m5.

Is that not more or less a fix idee of us audi fans and supporter.

Why would it be a disapointement if a 2000kg car with quattro would be a little bit slower than a lighter car with rear weel drive, witch you cant hardly use in the winter...

Im wondering if the new clients of the rs6 would buy only the car if he is faster then the m5. More ore less nobody of the main clients for the rs6 makes there judgement against the care because he might be 2 or 3 tenth slower up to 200 than for example an m5.

Any way the truth comes out sun, but we should not project our main hopes in to an offical quatto gmbh target, witch may never really exist.

(Mean the fact that the new super rs6 main goal should be to be faster in stright line than the m5 or what ever car...)

buyalemon
January 27th, 2008, 00:36
RS6 will be faster than the M5 ...it wouldn't be launched unless it wouldn't be.
They could easaly get 650 hp from a biturbo V10 if they like to! They've discovered that this kind of power 580 hp will do just fine at the moment!

If i'm wrong which I'm not...buy a chip for 1000$ and get 650 hp

Rutkowsky
January 27th, 2008, 00:42
and then get all excited like a chav, that your tuned car beats a stock car at a drag race!! :hihi: I don't think it will need tuning to be quicker, the same case scenario like RS4 vs new M3 just IMO, new car is a faster car

Leadfoot
January 27th, 2008, 10:09
Man, this old argument is still going on.

tonsberg31
January 27th, 2008, 18:52
This ''M5 comparison" can we take up again after the German Magazine "Sport Auto" and Horst Saurma journalist have done the "Supertest" with the new RS6. All people in Germany and Switzerland would probably agree on this...

Also we must not be fooled by a Duch journalist (who's private car could be a Mazda 323 1.3l) driving the new RS6 for the first time....:thumb:

Ie ; When do you switch gear on a car that has 650 NM on tap from
1.500 rpms to 6.250 rpms...:cheers:

skiwi
January 27th, 2008, 19:01
and then get all excited like a chav, that your tuned car beats a stock car at a drag race!! :hihi: I don't think it will need tuning to be quicker, the same case scenario like RS4 vs new M3 just IMO, new car is a faster car

seriously guys, who really gives a sh*t? drag racing between stop lights? really??

now, what about real driving machines. you know, ones that can take corners?