PDA

View Full Version : NOO ! ! ! IT could have been so awesome, but now...... =(



tvrfan
November 27th, 2007, 21:18
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/27/mysteriously-burnt-audi-revealed-to-be-v10-rs8/


"twin turbo V10 now out of question" :cry: :cry: :cry:

a dream is broken

crespo
November 27th, 2007, 21:20
it COOOOOOOOULD be a smoke screen, to keep with Audi's "under-promise, over-deliver" mantra... but I'm not so sure now.

chewym
November 27th, 2007, 21:28
The R8 would never have a lot more power than the Gallardo.

Damienr8
November 27th, 2007, 21:57
The R8 would never have a lot more power than the Gallardo.

Yup +1 to that

Leadfoot
November 27th, 2007, 21:58
The R8 would never have a lot more power than the Gallardo.

Never power but what about torque.:hahahehe:

Damienr8
November 27th, 2007, 22:25
Never power but what about torque.:hahahehe:

HEHEHE i wouldnt mind seeing a 520hp 580lb/ft V10 Turbo lol.

AndyBG
November 27th, 2007, 23:42
I think that R8 never meant to be turbo, V10 N/A is planed long time ago...

HKS786
November 28th, 2007, 00:39
Tvrfan:

Bro, I've got nothing against you but you gotta relax. Be honest, look at how the R8 compares to what an old memory would call "supercars". Just look at Topgear's own laptimes and you'll see that for yourself! That's only the V8 model...

Now, If Audi are making an R8-S or whatever they're calling it, obviously it'l be much better than the V8 model and it wont matter what engine they use! so what if it's just N/A V10, look at what their N/A V8 can do to "supecars"!

Cargo8
November 28th, 2007, 02:13
thats pretty sad :(, but nothing wrong with sporty feeling of high-rev v10...

Audiphile
November 28th, 2007, 04:36
A V10 N/A @ 520 bhp as previously discussed doesn't sound like a disappointment to me. You are talking under 4.0 sec time from 0-60 mph. We all know the V8 is better than the 4.3 sec. So, I am not sure what the concern is all about. The R8 V10 should be normally aspirated. It just fits it better than a turbo as this is a true mid-engine sports car.

Ti-Mike
November 28th, 2007, 08:00
There are so many restriktions for the R8 from brother and Sister companies .
That is the reason why the R8 still hasn't been delivered with Cermanic Brakes this is also the reason why there will be no V10 Twin Turbo.

KK265
November 28th, 2007, 11:37
On 1st of September I shared information about RS6 and R8.I think that i am correct....
http://www2.rs6.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12931&page=2

tvrfan
November 28th, 2007, 16:23
There are so many restriktions for the R8 from brother and Sister companies .
That is the reason why the R8 still hasn't been delivered with Cermanic Brakes this is also the reason why there will be no V10 Twin Turbo.

thats the only thing i hate about audi! they cant build their cars and engines with hp that they want. because they would kill porsche, lamborghini in sales and performance. THAT really suck

tvrfan
November 28th, 2007, 19:08
i hope the future brings the change ! and audi could build engines with hp strongness and models they want. no porsche and lamborghini wich stopping audi in their dreams.

Phage
November 28th, 2007, 22:02
i hope the future brings the change ! and audi could build engines with hp strongness and models they want. no porsche and lamborghini wich stopping audi in their dreams.

Are they audi's dreams or are they your dreams for audi? :vhmmm:

chewym
November 29th, 2007, 01:35
I am sure Audi did their work with the supercharger and it will be just fine.

tvrfan
November 29th, 2007, 20:12
Are they audi's dreams or are they your dreams for audi? :vhmmm:

i mean audis dreams, because i think they cant build their engines (hp strongness) and models that they want. because lamborghini and porsche.