Interesting information, thank you for sharing!
FWIW: Mustang tells us to allow for 28% driveline loss in Quattro, Automatic Audi pulls.
Steve
Interesting information, thank you for sharing!
FWIW: Mustang tells us to allow for 28% driveline loss in Quattro, Automatic Audi pulls.
Steve
"You have first to experience what you want to express" (V. Van Gogh)
Every dyno has different traits. Word on the street is Dynojet reads higher than Mustang. That is fine.
The solid data speaks for itself. The stock car in excellent tune put down a number. The modified car in excellent tune put down a bigger number. The combination of the two plus the VagCom data logs with each car on the dyno is the whipped cream on top. Now we can look over the logs and determine where and how the extra power was made.
Its too bad JRS could not make to the dyno because his car has a different upgrade path and should have been a good comparison to the other two cars. And the Wagner intercoolers could have been tested out to determine efficiency with VagCom data logs on IATemps.
Next time.
Yes. All the RS6's I've seen dyno'd were on a Mustang and have been between 300-330awhp.Originally Posted by SAFE4NOW
So,
250 page views and not a peep about the intercooler spray bar idea?
30awhp increase from just spraying some water on the outside of the intercoolers?
30 wheel hp from a squirt of water?
how much is that exactly per hp gain?
I guess bling is more important.
bling, bling, bling, bling and bling. Got to get me more bling.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote