Key word evolutionary theory and is called such for a reason.Originally posted by CarbonFibre
depending on which type of evolutionary theory you subscribe to.
As for recent daughters in our family, 3 daughters 7 boys in the last 8 years, so I guess it doesn't work with everyone. Having duaghters and boys has more to do with time of sexual intercourse and diet than anything else. Female sperm lives much longer and is much slower (and more durable) than male sperm and therefor if sex occurs 3 or 4 days before ovulation, bingo, your chances for a girl just shot way up (cause all the guy sperm died days ago whereas the girl sperm just finally made it on time). Having sex only 24 hours or less before ovulation greatly increases your chances of a boy (your betting the "boys" will get there way before the girls do and therefor get the job done days bfore the girls got a shot at things). Next time we have a kid, I'll let you know how it goes.
Again, I have no doubts to an animal's (or human's) ability to adapt to our/their environment. That is indeed a fact. But for me, it doesn't prove the theory of evolution. Why is it so difficult to believe in a creator for some? No one has ever seen a house and said, "that pile of wood must have slowly formed itself into a home, or that car must have been a pile of metal that slowly evolved into something better. No one ever questions those things. Yet on something infinitely more complicated (life) people so easily assume that the theory of evolution is fact. This is curious. An example:
If I dissasemble a blender, take all of its parts (maybe 20 or 25), put it into a washing machine and then turn on the washing machine, how many years will it take for those parts to come together and form a blender? 10 years? 1000 years? 1,000,000,000,000,000 years? Answer: never. It would never happen, ever. Yet I am to believe that all the needed ingredients to form life (infinitely more complicated) just "came together"? A tough pill to swallow.
Yet that is the reverse argument of evolutions about a creator. All creatures must have a creator so that proves God had a creator. Does it? If I am to expect that life could just form itself (even though we all have no problem admiting the blender theory shows this to be questionable at best), than why is it so far fetched that their could be something that actually doesn't have a creator? Something that actually never had a starting point?
Think about this because it applies just as much to ones who believe in the theory of evolution. Ok, the evolution theorist say, we came from acids and protiens. Ok. So where did they come from? And what did that come from? And then what didTHAT come from? To infinity. So a creator isn't a "creationist" question. It is a question that ALL mankind must ask. What started everything? What was there in the beginning? What existed before anything else?
A friendly debate that I am also enjoying.
Ben