Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: New Filters and MAF Comparo

  1. #1
    Registered User 4everRS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    1,921

    Post New Filters and MAF Comparo

    Well, I got new air filters. They were about due, and while doing some shopping on Amazon, I decided to get a couple K & N filters. I have been told before "don't waste your money" "just buy the paper ones". And for whatever reason, I ignored it.

    So I wanted to check and see in the logs what the difference would be. I was a little surprised. Below is a chart of MAF and RPM, identical runs, engine warmed up, ect ect.




    I think this is enough evidence of why NOT to waste your money on the K&N's. I was really expecting to see a little improvement in MAF. But no.
    Daytona gray RS6 - Totaled.
    Avus Silver RS6 - Viper Stage 2 ECU/TCU. To do: water/meth injection, gutted precats

  2. #2
    Registered User 4everRS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    1,921
    I am also not real happy that I'm not going over 400 on the MAF's. My mBar of boost isn't great either. I don't get to 2k. Barely gets to 1900. Requested and actual.
    Daytona gray RS6 - Totaled.
    Avus Silver RS6 - Viper Stage 2 ECU/TCU. To do: water/meth injection, gutted precats

  3. #3
    Registered User ben916's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,467
    Stock setting on the APR?

    How old are your MAF's?
    03 RS6 Avus, Sportec Cooling, Frozen rotors, EBC Reds, Aces 4, Apikol, Phaetons, + pedals, AWM, Aluminum Paddles, KomfortBlinker, Hotchkis, RNS-E

  4. #4
    Registered User ttboost's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Monroe, CT
    Posts
    1,524
    Hate to say I told you so, but....

    I spent a good afternoon on a dyno with my 996 Turbo testing this theory. Was tired of all the speculation about air filters, so I figured I would test them myself, back to back, same day, same weather, same dyno and actually waited and tested with the same engine and coolant temp. From paper, to K&N to no filter, power never varied more than 10-12hp. The problem was that those power difference were different everywhere in the rev range. Too inconsistant for me to justify running a filter that just doesn't filter that well. NOTHING filters better than paper. If you don't keep that K&N clean and oiled every week, you are just sandblasting your cylinder walls, period.
    2003 RS6 Mugello Blue on Ebony, EPL Tuned, 6 Speed Conversion COMPLETED!!!

  5. #5
    Registered User ttboost's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Monroe, CT
    Posts
    1,524
    I thought my MAF's were bad regarding my latest issues. Turns out MAF values are directly related to boost (I know, thanks Capt obvious). I was in limp mode (.3bar) and was only seeing 140g-150g, per MAF, at WOT during this time. Ultimately in the end, I think it was leaking MAF seals that was my problem. I have disconnected my MAF's from my airbox and fitted them directly in my plenum. They are NOT connected to my airbox any more. They will not come out unless I TAKE them out. My thought is, worst case scenario, I get a smidge of unfiltered air, but never have this problem again.I was actually able to push the airbox down far enough, so I think the rubber O rings in the airbox actually seal on the top of the MAF's, so not really even worried about the unfiltered air thing. My car now makes 1bar easily and I am now seeing 200-215g per MAF...

    PS...drove my car ALL day yesterday...almost 300 miles and not so much as a hiccup...
    2003 RS6 Mugello Blue on Ebony, EPL Tuned, 6 Speed Conversion COMPLETED!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •