Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: AMS - Bugatti Veyron Super Sport FULL TEST

  1. October 13th, 2011, 16:35 #1
    Erik
    Erik is offline
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    11,836

    No 1 AMS - Bugatti Veyron Super Sport FULL TEST

    http://www.germancarforum.com/intern...s-ams-bugatti-
    veyron-super-sport-full-test.html

    Test - Bugatti Veyron Super Sport (The record car)•Engine: W16 with 4-turbochargers
    •Power: 1200 hp / 6400 rpm
    •Torque: 1500 Nm / 3000 rpm
    •Weight (with full of fluids): 2026 kg
    •Vmax.: 431 km/h (limited to 415 km/h)
    •0-100 km/h: 2,7 s
    •0-130 km/h: 3,7 s
    •0-160 km/h: 4,9 s
    •0-200 km/h: 7,0 s
    •0-240 km/h: 10,0 s
    •0-280 km/h: 14,3 s
    •0-300 km/h: 17,5 s (979 m)

    •400 m: 9,9 s (239 km/h)

    •Braking (100-0 km/h): 36,7 m (cold/warm)
    •Braking (190-0 km/h): 132 m
    •18 m slalom: 66,0 km/h
    •110 m ISO evasive test: 147,2 km/h
    •Basic price: €1.666.000,-
    •Price as tested: €2.320.500,-

    Verdict:
    Because of the extremely high costs and fuel consumption it got 4 stars out of 5.
    Power and acceleration is brutal, the braking distances are good, but not sensational. The interior quality is on an "extremely high" level.





    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS46c...eature=related
    RS6.com Owner and Admin - Click here to send me an e-mail

    Audi RS6 Avant -"The family estate that's as fast as a Ferrari"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. October 13th, 2011, 17:28 #2
    Z07
    Z07 is offline
    Registered User Z07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Erik View Post
    Because of the extremely high costs and fuel consumption it got 4 stars out of 5
    What were they expecting? 60mpg on the combined cycle?

    The performance stats in teh video are slightly different:

    0-400: 9.8@238kph.

    0-100mph in 4.8s, LOL! 60-100mph in 2.3s! That's what I call good clean overtaking.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. October 13th, 2011, 19:11 #3
    ben916
    ben916 is offline
    Registered User ben916's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    4,438
    I would still take two...
    03 RS6 Avus, Sportec Cooling, Frozen rotors, EBC Reds, Aces 4, Apikol, Phaetons, + pedals, AWM, Aluminum Paddles, KomfortBlinker, Hotchkis, RNS-E
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. October 13th, 2011, 21:17 #4
    Z07
    Z07 is offline
    Registered User Z07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,389
    Heavy though. 4545lbs ~ 2.07 metric tons
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. October 14th, 2011, 07:05 #5
    Erik
    Erik is offline
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    11,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Z07 View Post
    Heavy though. 4545lbs ~ 2.07 metric tons
    It's all about PERFORMANCE Think about it as the FAT guy in the class beating you in sports.
    RS6.com Owner and Admin - Click here to send me an e-mail

    Audi RS6 Avant -"The family estate that's as fast as a Ferrari"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. October 14th, 2011, 12:31 #6
    Z07
    Z07 is offline
    Registered User Z07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Erik View Post
    It's all about PERFORMANCE Think about it as the FAT guy in the class beating you in sports.
    *Bart Simpson shudder*

    Yeah, I guess it's like a Sumo beating Usain Bolt in the 100m. Good bit heavier than the 1838kg quoted though.

    This is still faster:

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. October 17th, 2011, 21:18 #7
    Ruergard
    Ruergard is offline
    Moderator Ruergard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,926
    Send a message via MSN to Ruergard
    Quote Originally Posted by Z07 View Post

    This is still faster:

    And as me and Erik. It's a Swede.

    Great numbers from the Bugatti..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. October 18th, 2011, 11:39 #8
    Z07
    Z07 is offline
    Registered User Z07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,389
    Ruergard and Erik with some Koenigseggs:




    Here are the official figures:

    http://www.koenigsegg.com/

    I'd like to see a lighter Veyron in the near future. Something near R8 weight.
    Last edited by Z07; October 18th, 2011 at 13:04.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. October 18th, 2011, 15:00 #9
    Erik
    Erik is offline
    Admin Erik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    11,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Z07 View Post
    This is still faster :
    I'm involved in parts of this car, so I don't mind
    RS6.com Owner and Admin - Click here to send me an e-mail

    Audi RS6 Avant -"The family estate that's as fast as a Ferrari"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. October 18th, 2011, 20:44 #10
    Ruergard
    Ruergard is offline
    Moderator Ruergard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,926
    Send a message via MSN to Ruergard
    Z07, tsss!

    Some really great numbers for the Koenigsegg. I was glad when seeing them a while back that they finally backed their specs up. It's mindblowingly fast.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. October 19th, 2011, 13:11 #11
    Z07
    Z07 is offline
    Registered User Z07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,389
    Looks like the SSC Tuatara might be faster. Proto testing has allegedly achieved 0-200 in 16s.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules