How to figure out if you have an ECU flash/tune already...

[RS6Steve]

Here are some of my logs for you to compare, my MAF numbers are now a lot better since I re seated them
RPM MAF1 MAF2 Boost Boost
(specified) (Actual)
4200 128.67 149.33 1650 1660
4360 138.28 155.92 1670 1700
4520 147.47 157.83 1690 1710
4680 154.39 161.14 1690 1690
4800 156.92 166.69 1710 1680
4960 160.94 174.89 1680 1680
5120 170.42 183.28 1650 1670
5280 174 188.03 1670 1680
5480 178.33 193.83 1690 1660
5680 181.17 202.56 1720 1660
5840 191.44 201.92 1700 1670
6040 201.03 207.47 1690 1700
6200 206.28 211.81 1690 1720
6360 201.5 208.42 1700 1730
6480 206.03 211.81 1710 1720
6560 203.64 215.22 1690 1740
6000 189.28 208.58 1700 1730
5240 163.72 186.11 1670 1690
4760 145.17 159.92 1660 1680
4800 146.44 160.19 1650 1650
4880 152.61 161.86 1640 1620
4960 158.83 169.25 1630 1640
5040 133.94 159.56 1570 1660
5080 103.56 119.89 1140 1460
5120 90.03 105.89 990 1280
4960 5.39 16.14 990 1360

I'm pretty sure I need new DV's as my boost does not drop off that fast

[JRS-RS6]

Here are some of my logs for you to compare, my MAF numbers are now a lot better since I re seated them
RPM MAF1 MAF2 Boost Boost
(specified) (Actual)
4200 128.67 149.33 1650 1660
4360 138.28 155.92 1670 1700
4520 147.47 157.83 1690 1710
4680 154.39 161.14 1690 1690
4800 156.92 166.69 1710 1680
4960 160.94 174.89 1680 1680
5120 170.42 183.28 1650 1670
5280 174 188.03 1670 1680
5480 178.33 193.83 1690 1660
5680 181.17 202.56 1720 1660
5840 191.44 201.92 1700 1670
6040 201.03 207.47 1690 1700
6200 206.28 211.81 1690 1720
6360 201.5 208.42 1700 1730
6480 206.03 211.81 1710 1720
6560 203.64 215.22 1690 1740
6000 189.28 208.58 1700 1730
5240 163.72 186.11 1670 1690
4760 145.17 159.92 1660 1680
4800 146.44 160.19 1650 1650
4880 152.61 161.86 1640 1620
4960 158.83 169.25 1630 1640
5040 133.94 159.56 1570 1660
5080 103.56 119.89 1140 1460
5120 90.03 105.89 990 1280
4960 5.39 16.14 990 1360

I'm pretty sure I need new DV's as my boost does not drop off that fast

A little better but it would be helpful to have time stamps too. From what you have above requested and actual are within +/- 30 mbar (<.5 PSI) most of the time. Now if your sampling every second you may need DVs but both being bad (notice the difference in MAFs on last data point). Seeing as the MAFs drop off as you drop RPM and there are only three requested points lower than actual before that if you are sampling Turbo mode than this would be response time -- would it not? If you are sampling every .1 sec what is the issue? I usually graph Requested and Actual Boost and RPM over time and scale the RPM to the right axis (4000 to 7000) and the Boost to the left (1000 to 2500). Run in Turbo mode this provides a sampling rate around once every .1 seconds. From the MAFs it looks like you peak around 520 HP