Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Nissan GT-R vs Porsche GT3 vs Porsche 997 Turbo vs Lamborghini Gallardo vs Honda NSX

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    871

    Nissan GT-R vs Porsche GT3 vs Porsche 997 Turbo vs Lamborghini Gallardo vs Honda NSX


  2. #2
    Registered User The Pretender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Centre.
    Posts
    3,617
    I will take the GT-R if you don't mind.

    Jarod.
    There are pretenders among us.....
    Geniuses with the ability to become anyone they want to be.....

  3. #3
    Registered User Leadfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    7,791
    The quicker car won, now imagine what the R8v10 will be like.
    Search and you will find the truth.

  4. #4
    Registered User The Pretender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Centre.
    Posts
    3,617
    Quote Originally Posted by Leadfoot View Post
    The quicker car won, now imagine what the R8v10 will be like.
    A little bid slower then the Gallardo Superleggera in this movie.
    The Audi R8 V10 5.2 FSI will not weigh 1330 Kg, probably more like 1560+ Kg.

    Jarod.
    There are pretenders among us.....
    Geniuses with the ability to become anyone they want to be.....

  5. #5
    Registered User jonas_dg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    278
    I don't get why the turbo and the gt3 are like 3 secs slower?? The GT-R is quick but I didn't think it'd beat a gt3 by more than 3 secs

  6. #6
    Registered User Leadfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    7,791
    Quote Originally Posted by The Pretender View Post
    A little bid slower then the Gallardo Superleggera in this movie.
    The Audi R8 V10 5.2 FSI will not weigh 1330 Kg, probably more like 1560+ Kg.

    Jarod.
    Not wanting to disagree with a fellow car nut but you need to check just how much quicker the Superleggera is compared to the normal R8 on the Befdford Autodrome. I think you will find that the R8 chassis is more than capable of besting it's time when more power is added.
    Search and you will find the truth.

  7. #7
    Registered User itisme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    D
    Posts
    905
    the sound of that Gallardo is 100 times better than the GT-R's... and the better looking car won, too


    me like
    Vorsprung durch Technik

  8. #8
    Registered User Z07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,391
    I'm surprised the GTR was faster than the SL at the start. The GTR started behind the Gallardo SL and finished behind it. Problem = weight. Take out the rear seats and fit ultra-light front seats, problem solved with enough spare cash to buy a secondhand 2006 Gallardo.

    The SL is 330kg lighter and has CCBs. After 5 laps that begins to tell. The GTR's best lap is also a second down on its record best. This has to be the best loss ever.
    Last edited by Z07; January 27th, 2008 at 14:49.

  9. #9
    Registered User Z07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by Leadfoot View Post
    Not wanting to disagree with a fellow car nut but you need to check just how much quicker the Superleggera is compared to the normal R8 on the Befdford Autodrome. I think you will find that the R8 chassis is more than capable of besting it's time when more power is added.
    Unfortunately nobody has ever duplicated the success Evo had with the R8 at Bedford Autodrome at any other track. There's no doubt it's a great car but the Evo lap was borderline Enzo performance. Most other tests have shown it to be roughly equivalent to the GT3, which is no mean feat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •