Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 18 of 35

Thread: Giac Ecu/tcu (2007)

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164

    Giac Ecu/tcu (2007)

    Hello All,

    I finally had the ECU flashed and the TCU socketed last week. I'll start by saying WOW!!!!! Now I know what everyone is talking about.

    I just took it on a 1000 mile roadtrip. First impressions: The shifting is awesome, much more refined. The shifting is much quicker and smooth in automatic mode (S or D), although in using the paddles/manual shift, the reaction time on upshifts/downshifts is not much different. The throttle is much, much, much more sensitive. You barely touch and the car jumps to authority (some may not like that in traffic) So, I am learning to modulate the go pedal. The power increase significant. It seems as if it has "endless torque."The fourth gear is SICK! Rollin at about 85 MPH in 4th and just roll your foot into the pedal and "all is right in the world" . 120 comes up a lot quicker! I havent taken it over 140 yet, as I mostly enjoy 80-120 sprints and highway overtaking. Although I bought the car for highway cruising not 1/4 mile drag strip, I tried a few launches. Each launch was different (due to my own inconsistencies). Some I experienced a half second of lag, and some straight scared the shit out of me . Bottom line, a worthy upgrade to an already amazing car. I switched back to "stock mode" a few times with the flashloader, just to compare the difference and WOW! Definitely worth it and so far the transmission remains intact (knocking on wood).

    I'll post dyno results when I get them.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    104
    Very nice! I just went with O.CT. First time I've owned a car whose acceleration actually picks up at around 115 . Haven't gone much beyond that yet.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    104
    Oh - how does it compare to your Stage 3 S4? I briefly drove a well-tuned Stage 3 a couple of years ago, and from what I recall acceleration felt similar to the RS6.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by ruxprncd View Post
    Oh - how does it compare to your Stage 3 S4? I briefly drove a well-tuned Stage 3 a couple of years ago, and from what I recall acceleration felt similar to the RS6.
    I havent run the two side by side. But getting out of one and into the other, the S4 felt the same as the RS6 stock. So I'll have to see how they do now. Currently I'm having some "running too lean", and "misfire" codes on the S4 that need to be addressed first, then a little "highway investigation" will be in order

    And congrats on the O.ct! After researching all the software options, they all seem to make about the same power. I ended up going with the GIAC since I have had good luck with them in the past and I already have the flashloader. I also got a discount since the GIAC shop I use had not done an RS6 yet.

  5. #5
    Registered User Avus-RS6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kirkland, WA
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by got boost View Post
    I havent run the two side by side. But getting out of one and into the other, the S4 felt the same as the RS6 stock.
    I felt that my ASP stage 3 S4 was more violent than the stock RS6. Basically similar HP/TQ but 400-500lbs less and an extra gear(6mt). That being said, I prefer the pull of the RS6 given the engine isn't close to being stressed. I was always having misfire issues, O2 codes, and various other issues with the S4. That tends to happen when you double the factory output. ;-)

    Jason

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by Avus-RS6 View Post
    I felt that my ASP stage 3 S4 was more violent than the stock RS6. Basically similar HP/TQ but 400-500lbs less and an extra gear(6mt). That being said, I prefer the pull of the RS6 given the engine isn't close to being stressed. I was always having misfire issues, O2 codes, and various other issues with the S4. That tends to happen when you double the factory output. ;-)

    Jason
    Well said!

    I was running an old version of the GIAC software (2004) in the S4 and it was runnin like Jekyll and Hyde, really poured all the power on at once (which would suck in "mid-corner") Since I've had the more recent version installed, the power delivery is much more linear, less flat spots. Ive recently increased fuel delivery at 1/4 throttle, which feels better but is most likely the cause of my multi-page VAG-COM printout (LOL!). Time for some peek and tweak.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    So I finally got off my @$$ and dynoed yesterday. Its been awhile since the upgrade.

    Stock it was 353hp/375tq, now with GIAC it is 365hp/428tq. I thought there would be more of numerical difference since it is such a noticeable difference on the road. Does this seem right? what does this calculate to the crank?

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    and BTW, I finally have the S4 runnin well. Did some side by side comparisons not too long ago. The S4 was very aggressive off the line and to 100, but the RS6 seems to reel it in above 100. Still need to continue testing

  9. #9
    Registered User Spidercat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mililani, Hawaii
    Posts
    604
    got boost,

    AWE tuning (a Willow Grove, PA distributer for GIAC) quotes similar stock dyno numbers as you (350 HP @ the wheels, which is similar to yours @ 353 HP at the wheels). To estimate the HP at the crank, they multiple by 1.285, whereas with yours it would be 1.275, to give roughly 450 HP at the crank. Their chipped numbers are different than yours, however. They quote about 404 HP @ the wheels, or about 519 HP @ the crank, whereas yours would work out to about 465 HP @ the crank using the same 1.275 conversion factor.

    Their stock torque figures are much different from yours, however. They quote 343 ft-lbs stock, and you've got 375 ft-lbs. Their chipped max torque is 414 ft-lbs, whereas you've got 428 ft-lbs. Their torque increased by 71 ft-lbs, while yours increased by about 53 ft-lbs (although you have higher numbers overall before and after. I don't know what to make of that. Their numbers were on 93 octane pump gas. They have another dyno run on 91 octane pump gas, which shows 336 hp @ the wheels stock (432 HP @ the crank) and 378 HP @ the wheels chipped (486 HP @ the crank). On 91 octane, their torque increased by 78 ft-lbs, from 310 to 387 ft-lbs.

    (Here is AWE's website to check it out for yourself:

    http://www.awe-tuning.com/pages/gallery/rs6/index.cfm

    The seat-of-the-pants difference you feel sounds like more than a 3% increase in HP shown on the dyno. Could the dyno have been miscalibrated for the "chipped" run? Your torque figures seem much better than the numbers AWE dyno'd, which agrees with the felt difference. I'm curious since I've been shopping around for an ECU/TCU chipset for a few months now but still haven't taken the plunge.
    Otherwise, has the reliability for the GIAC be alright? I've combed the feedback on this sight, and they all (GIAC, APR, O.CT, etc.) seem to get hit-or-miss reviews except MTM, which everyone appears to be satisfied with (if anyone has the MTM chip and hates it, please correct me). Anyway, hope the above link helps. Maybe you could contact your GIAC dealer and fax them your dyno printout and see what they come up with?

    Cordially,
    Mark

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    Mark, thanks for the response. The run was done on a "dyno dynamics" dyno both times, I'm not sure how different that is to the mustang dyno. I'm not too worried about it because it feels great. I actually had the opportunity to drive another GIAC tuned RS6 (along with many other mods) and the acceleration felt the same, but the Milltek exhaust in the other RS6 sounds better, the stasis suspension felt better, and the alcon/stasis brakes felt better IMO, but thats info for another thread. Back to the GIAC, as for reliability, 8 months and just under 20,000 miles on the software, so far so good knockin on wood. Ive had the car for about a year now and I would definitely do it all over again.

    Good luck with your decision. If you are searching and finding hit or miss issues with all the vendors, check to see if the TCU was done on the cars with the issues. I'm not sure if early on (2003) people were addressing the tcu upgrade and that may have precipitated the issues.

  11. #11
    Registered User DuckWingDuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    2,448
    Got_boost, when it's all said and done, what was your out of pocket hit getting the GIAC ECU?

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckWingDuck View Post
    Got_boost, when it's all said and done, what was your out of pocket hit getting the GIAC ECU?
    It was about 2500 installed with all programs.

    (edit: that was for both ecu and tcu, I dont know what it would have been with only ecu)

  13. #13
    Registered User DuckWingDuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    2,448
    Damn, that's not bad at all!

  14. #14
    Registered User Aronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Binghamton Area, NY
    Posts
    3,739
    Where did you get it done???

    Mike

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by Aronis View Post
    Where did you get it done???

    Mike

    Shine Racing Service in Mass. Unfortunately they are no longer a GIAC dealer anymore. I'm not sure where you are located but KTR Motorsports in Ayer Mass. is a GIAC dealer.

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    11

    got boost

    Is KTR where you had you RS6 dynoed; if so Ive heard that's a harsh dyno.
    ( " Heartbreaker " I believe it's nickname is..)

  17. #17
    Registered User Aronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Binghamton Area, NY
    Posts
    3,739
    I know where KTR is ......but everytime I am in town visiting we are in my wifes SUV...LOL


    Mike

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newport RI
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultslpr View Post
    Is KTR where you had you RS6 dynoed; if so Ive heard that's a harsh dyno.
    ( " Heartbreaker " I believe it's nickname is..)

    LOL! yeah thats the heartbreaker.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •