View Full Version : Sport Auto - RS4 after 100.000 km
Erik
November 11th, 2002, 15:30
Audi RS4 with sport package tested after 100.000 km in sport auto nr. 11 2002.
Nice to see it goes faster with time :devil:
Seems to be an expensive car to run... :vsad:
Erik
November 11th, 2002, 15:31
Page 1
Erik
November 11th, 2002, 15:32
Page 43
Erik
November 11th, 2002, 15:35
Don't look unless you really want to know about the cost :red:
Erik
November 11th, 2002, 15:36
Last page. :roll:
rs4steve
November 11th, 2002, 16:54
english translation please?
J.Seven
November 12th, 2002, 12:09
0-200Kph are strangely slower than the M5. I´ve seen RS4 making 18.1sec till 200Kph.
J.Seven
Gabriel343
November 17th, 2002, 21:14
Originally posted by J.Seven
0-200Kph are strangely slower than the M5. I´ve seen RS4 making 18.1sec till 200Kph.
J.Seven
M3 tested in Italy 17,6":cool:
Erik
November 17th, 2002, 21:18
M3 tested vs. MB CLK 55 AMG in the Sport Auto 12 2002.
0 - 100 in 5.2 secs / 5.3 secs.
0 - 200 in 18.6 secs / 18.7 secs.
100 - 0 is impressive, 35.1 for M3 and 37 for MB.
The MB is 1 second slower on Hockenheim (small).
Gabriel343
November 17th, 2002, 21:41
Originally posted by Erik B
M3 tested vs. MB CLK 55 AMG in the Sport Auto 12 2002.
0 - 100 in 5.2 secs / 5.3 secs.
0 - 200 in 18.6 secs / 18.7 secs.
100 - 0 is impressive, 35.1 for M3 and 37 for MB.
The MB is 1 second slower on Hockenheim (small).
The new CLK? 18,6 secs? In Italy Quattroruote 2/2002 tested 0-200 km/h 17,6" manual and SMG
Erik
November 17th, 2002, 21:47
I think you can't compare one magazines results to anothers.
There are so many variables that could change from time to time.
I try to use sport auto vs. sport auto figures etc. when comparing, it's the only way really.
Otherwise you'll end up with some poor old report about a car doing superb figures in China.